Objective
This project aims to investigate the factors which influence public perceptions of the risks associated with genetically manipulated foods across European countries. Genetically manipulated foods are an important field of technological innovation and commercial growth in biotechnology, but there is uneven evidence of considerable, if ill defined, public anxiety about what may be involved in such unfamiliar though potentially beneficial new fields. This project has the aims: of identifying the contents and patterns of background factors which may affect public perceptions (such as views of the scope and responsiveness of the risk management-regulatory system, of the ethical acceptability of gene transfer from animals to plants, or of the industrialisation of food generally); of assisting the more clear and constructive public articulation of such concerns as may be found, so as to assist democratic robustness in innovation; and to facilitate analysis of the European policy implications of whatever variations are found in the play of such risk perceptions factors across the arena studied.
The project will use qualitative methods (focus groups and interviews) combined with workshops with stakeholders, to identify background factors behind attitudes of lay public participants. The later will be selected according to criteria derived from general risk perceptions research, knowledge of GMOs-food issues, and from a small amount of existing specialist but localised research on public perceptions of GM foods, some of which was conducted in the UK by the main applicant, and in Germany by another partner. State of the art research in this field indicates the key importance of trust in shaping public concerns, but also that trust is a multi-dimensional variable which may be influenced by experience in adjacent issues (such as BSE) and other indirect factors (such as general experience of the accessibility, transparency and scope of the regulatory-advisory process in each country or in the EU as a whole). These factors and variations in them across the partner countries, will be explored.
The outputs of the project will be fresh insights into the less direct factors which influence public concerns and an exploration of the means through which better expression of such concerns could be assisted in the regulatory process, to the benefit of democratically robust, sustainable and effective technological choice and innovation.
These outputs will be disseminated through academic publications in the world-wide literature; but also through several means to user communities in government, industry and NGOs. These include user-workshops, publications in user-journals, presentations to user-meetings and personal roles with user-groups. The project team is experienced in these novel kinds of user-interactive research and dissemination whilst sustaining high standards in international research terms.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences political sciences political policies civil society civil society organisations nongovernmental organizations
- agricultural sciences agricultural biotechnology
- medical and health sciences medical biotechnology genetic engineering gene therapy
You need to log in or register to use this function
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Data not available
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Data not available
Coordinator
LA1 4YT Lancaster
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.