Skip to main content
Go to the home page of the European Commission (opens in new window)
English English
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS
Content archived on 2024-05-07

MANUFACTURING AND VALIDATION OF INDUSTRIAL PROTOTYPES OF BIAXIAL CREEP AND SHEAR TESTING MACHINES

Objective

The project built on the advances made in earlier EU funded Brite Euram projects to develop commercial prototypes of two types of materials testing machine (compression /tension and shear testing), which could be utilised under different temperature conditions. The objectives were to improve the design of the laboratory prototype machines and develop these into full commercial prototypes that could be validated and allow market assessments to be made. The project involved testing a range of different materials and the incorporation of feedback from the user interests in the consortium to develop the machines. Marketing assessments were made through trade exhibitions, literature, video and CD Rom. A patent application to the EPO was successful. The main constraint would appear to be the lack of sufficient manufacturing quality for the design of the commercial prototypes. At the completion of the final report, there was considerable further work to be done to ensure successful marketing.

The project aimed to develop industrial prototypes of the two testing machines for commercialisation. In this respect, a consortium including IMMG and a company called TNC Electronics provided the required sensors/controls and implemented them on the industrial version of the machines. In addition universities in materials research and equipment design (Imperial College, TU Clausthal) and a Ceramics-Refractory Company (CERECO S.A.) contributed to the validation of the industrial prototypes both by providing the necessary specifications for different categories of materials testing (composite, metals, ceramics) and by performing tests on an industrial scale with realistic specimens. Modifications of the loading train, extensometers, control systems etc. for each category of materials were also suggested and realised. Exploitation aspects and suitable promotional activities in the international market were given special emphasis.

Commercialisation of the testing machines could contribute to improving the competitiveness of material producers and manufacturers from the aeronautic and automobile industry by providing experimental facilities to simulate conditions developing in real structures. The new testing machines are capable of performing in a cost-effective manner valuable biaxial creep-fatigue and shear tests that cannot be carried out with the currently existing machines.

Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)

CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.

You need to log in or register to use this function

Keywords

Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)

Topic(s)

Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.

Call for proposal

Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.

Data not available

Funding Scheme

Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.

CSC - Cost-sharing contracts

Coordinator

INSTITUTE OF MECHANICAL OF MATERIALS AND GEOSTRUCTURES SA (IMMG)
EU contribution
No data
Address
ASKITON STREET 22
15236 PENDELI
Greece

See on map

Total cost

The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.

No data

Participants (5)

My booklet 0 0