Objective
Many European countries are experimenting with "workfare" - programmes requiring people to work in jobs established by public authorities in return for social assistance. This project would research workfare programmes to produce a comparative model (taxonomy) of such schemes and a review of their empirical outcomes, informing both research and policy development.
More specifically the project has three objectives, each the managerial responsibility of a named institution. These aims are:
- The development of a common analytic framework and evaluation methodology for comparative studies of "work for social assistance" (workfare) policies.
- The description and evaluation of current and previous programmes, building on that framework.
- The development of recommendations for programme evolution, and priorities for additional research.
In the proposal, we argue that unemployment continues to be a common European problem. Usually targeted at young recipients of social assistance, workfare is proposed as a solution that will assist re-integration, reduce costs, discourage dependence and/or target social assistance on the most needy. Current and future trends suggest workfare will become more important. Evidence gathered from six countries demonstrates both a significant history of workfare in Europe, and a recent expansion in the number of such programmes. Programme evaluations have been conducted, or are in progress, based on a multiplicity of objectives and which have reached a range of initial conclusions.
The research would commence with a review of existing knowledge, designed to build a conceptual model of workfare. This will provide the basis for re-analysis or re-evaluation of existing data and information, and data collection in two countries where workfare schemes exist but have not yet been evaluated. Existing impact studies will be supplemented by process studies in all countries, important since implementation often differs from policy. The integration of new and existing research studies will indicate those features of schemes that are relatively effective, and those less so, and the problems faced in moving from policy to successful implementation.
The network of institutions has been formed on the basis both of pre-existing liaison arrangements, and the identification of leading researchers knowledgeable about social assistance and the labour market, and experienced in the methods of workfare evaluations.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- humanities history and archaeology history
- social sciences economics and business business and management employment
- social sciences sociology social issues unemployment
You need to log in or register to use this function
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Data not available
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
0608 OSLO
Norway
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.