Skip to main content
Go to the home page of the European Commission (opens in new window)
English English
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS
Content archived on 2024-04-16

An economic analysis framework for waste charges and deposit-refund systems

Objective


Policy oriented, economic analysis of deposit refund systems (DRS) has been carried out with respect to hazardous waste management area. A comprehensive risk based economic framework was used to examine the effect of existing hazardous waste regulations on waste management decisions. This framework was applied to problems of noncompliance, regulatory enforcement, safe disposal and waste minimization. The problem of designing a DRS for waste ore was analysed in terms of the framework provided.

The effects of a tax subsidy instrument are largely determined by 4 parameters:
the extent of regulatory noncompliance;
the relative risks posed by noncompliant disposal;
the degree to which firms are responsive to the cost of approved disposal;
the level of transactions costs implicit in administering the programme.

From the analysis 3 major conclusions were drawn. First, transactions costs matter: in cases like used oil, they dominate the analysis. Transactions costs take a variety of forms.
Second, tax subsidy instruments are not all purpose solutions to hazardous waste problems.
Finally, when the kinds of problems arise that give merit to the tax subsidy approach, other regulatory methods will probably perform poorly by comparison. The tax subsidy instrument achieves reductions in risk in an efficient manner. If it cannot generate positive net benefits under plausible real world conditions, then it is likely that no regulatory instrument will do so. A corollary to this conclusion is that the tax subsidy instrument will achieve any globally inefficient objective at less cost than other regulatory methods. This last result seems to be a particularly important lesson in the hazardous waste area, because the pursuit of positive net social benefits has not been incorporated in the policy framework established by statue.

Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)

CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.

You need to log in or register to use this function

Programme(s)

Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.

Topic(s)

Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.

Data not available

Call for proposal

Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.

Data not available

Funding Scheme

Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.

CSC - Cost-sharing contracts

Coordinator

Oxford Institute for Energy Studies
EU contribution
No data
Address
57 Woodstock Road
OX2 6FA Oxford
United Kingdom

See on map

Total cost

The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.

No data
My booklet 0 0