Objective
The overall goal for Project SAMI, as specified in Task 1.6/33 is:
i) to define a comprehensive assessment methodology;
ii) to describe major findings and policy recommendations on CTP issues including policy implementation in the CEEC/CIS;
iii) to define and develop decision models (presented in a report and an interactive computer program) which can be used in relation to the interactions between policy instruments/measures and identified CTP targets;
iv) to prepare a short manual/guide for strategic policy assessment on CTP issues, addressing the policy and decision-makers.
Within the overall goal, the following specific, measurable objectives have been specified, each related to a work package, each directly measurable, and each contributing to one or more of the project deliverables:
1) to identify candidate CTP targets and assess possible conflicts and synergies between them in order to define the structure of a target system including hierarchical levels, interactions, and quantifiable indicators;
2) to define scenarios and sets of possible CTP instruments related to selected targets;
3) to refine and test an optimisation methodology - previously developed on an urban level - on the European strategic level;
4) to define and develop a strategic assessment methodology - including necessary software - for system-wide (European) impacts of policy packages;
5) to clarify the conditions for CTP implementation on the European level when considering also the implications in the CEEC/CIS.
Links with other projects, tasks, areas, programmes, policy actions:
Definition of the scenarios: projects SCENARIOS (tasks 1.1.2/11A 12 A, 13), STREAMS (1.1.2/11A 12 A), POSSUM (1.1.2/13).
Instruments: projects QUITS (task 1.2/14) TRENEN II STRAN, PETS, ECONOMETRIST, EUROTOLL (all four in task 1.2/15) SORT IT, MINIMISE (both in task 1.4/23).
Methodology: results of COST 328, ideas from NECTAR.
Optimisation process: project OPTIMA (task 5.4/23).
Modelling: projects ECONOMETRIST (task 1.2/17) COMMUTE, MEET (both in task 1.2/18) ECOPAC, EUNET (both in task 1.2/19).
Data management: project INFOSTAT (tasks 1.1.1/1-3) new project carrying out task 1.1.1/4.
Co-ordination with TENASSESS (tasks 1.6/32 36), ASTRA (task 1.6/34) and a new project carrying out task 1.6/35.
Close co-operation with projects EUNET and COMMUTE (tasks 1.2/18-19).
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Data not available
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
33101 Tampere
Finland
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.