Project description
How people morally evaluate authority
Authority shapes human societies at every level. However, little is known about how people form moral judgments about when power is legitimate or abusive. Supported by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme, the LEGIT project will develop the first computational models that explain how the human mind evaluates authority, obedience, and fairness in hierarchical structures such as parent-child, leader-follower, or citizen-government relationships. These models will be tested in scenarios involving power and authority, and their predictions will be evaluated across 20 countries spanning five continents. The findings will shed light on universal patterns and cultural differences. Ultimately, the project will create a new framework for understanding how humans perceive legitimate authority.
Objective
When do people perceive authority as morally legitimate? Surprisingly little research in cognitive science has examined how the mind makes moral judgments about authority. Instead, most research in moral cognition has focused on non-hierarchical domains, such as when it is permissible to harm, or which distributions of resources are fair. This is a major gap in the literature, since moral obligations across human societies are structured by hierarchical relationships (e.g. parent-child, leader-follower, governor-governed). Why do human minds perceive that some individuals have a right to command, and others a duty to obey? Why do they see some uses of power as rightful and others as abusive? Why do people think that leaders are entitled to resources and deference? Answering these questions is essential, not only to understand the workings of our moral minds, but also to organize societies in ways people see as just. And it is also timely, given the crisis in legitimacy facing governments and democratic systems across European countries. To fill this critical gap, we will propose, formalize, and test a new theory of the cognitive algorithms underlying moral intuitions of legitimacy. First, we will build the first computational cognitive models of legitimacy intuitions, formalizing their mental operations as implicit negotiations over fair terms of hierarchy. Second, we will test quantitative predictions of these cognitive models against participant moral judgments of experimental scenarios about authority and obedience. Third, we will identify universal and culturally variable dimensions of these moral computations by running our experiments across 20 countries on five continents. This project will train the fellow in computational cognitive methods developed at MIT and Harvard (under Prof. Rebecca Saxe and Fiery Cushman) and transfer this expertise back to Europe, in a host institution specializing in cross-cultural research (Toulouse School of Economics, France).
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
This project has not yet been classified with EuroSciVoc.
Be the first one to suggest relevant scientific fields and help us improve our classification service
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.2 - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-GF - HORIZON TMA MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships - Global Fellowships
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) HORIZON-MSCA-2025-PF
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
31080 Toulouse
France
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.