How people cope with possible disasters depends on a lot of factors, and in many cases reactions to emergency situations do not depend by rational decisions.
How individuals and groups apply knowledge, interpret data and adopt their own criteria for decision making with respect to known/unknown risks is something strongly affected by their culture, behaviours and knowledge commonly shared within a community. In other words, culture can be considered as the reference framework to assess if something is acceptable/normal/usual or not. In the DRR context, culture and safety culture are the framework that enable individuals and organizations to reach an appropriate risk awareness, to benefit from shared knowledge and practices, to engage themselves in cooperative, and finally more effective, disaster management.
CORE project has embraced such concepts and will consider communities perspectives by using a transdisciplinary approach.
More in details the project has:
• identified a series of case studies from previous natural and manmade disasters and crisis incidents
• extracted lessons learnt from a variety of perspectives including human factors, organizational issues and societal aspects, including gender and ethnicity, education, income, physical abilities, etc.
• analysed communication patters, including social media, mobile applications, web sites etc., in EU countries during routine and crise periods
• created and started implementing a communication and dissemination plan to ensure the maximization of the project impact
In the last months of the project, CORE will:
• examine the public messaging challenges faced by authorities responsible for decision-making and associated processes, extracting best practices and lessons learned
• analyse disaster preparedness strategies, including vulnerable categories behavior analysis;
• analyse how cultural changes among individuals, business managers, government officials, and communities can create a resilient society in Europe, in line with the SFDRR
• compare EU countries focusing on differences in preparedness and DRR mechanisms with regards to prepositioning, training, framework contracts and supplier management
• define of a series of human centeredness indicators allowing to measure to what extent emergency plans and operations fits needs and characteristics of all considered social groups, measuring how positive or negative safety culture is in disaster scenarios
• evaluate the role of risk cost-benefit analysis for planning, decision making and for enhancing safety culture. Analysis on the role of testing, validation and trust for enhancing safety culture
• organize a competition with high schools to create the CORE APP containing useful information about how to behave in emergency situations and suggestions on how to increase preparedness. The young generation become a sort of "prevention sentinels"