Project description
A ‘big picture approach’ of Neolithic settlement
What motivated the large-scale settlement of Near Eastern arid lands in the late Neolithic period? How complex were these population movements? The EU-funded MARGINS project will answer these questions. Considering a multi-directional cultural interchange, it will investigate settlement patterns and land use through subsistence activities and their adaptations to constraints of arid contexts. Specifically, the project will propose renewed scenarios of Neolithic 'conquest' of Near Eastern arid lands and clarify its factors of influence, particularly the respective impacts of environmental components and socio-economic choices. The findings will break through barriers that have prevented a ‘big picture approach’ of this 'conquest' by bringing together an unprecedented combination of methods.
Objective
At the end of the Near Eastern neolithization process (PPNC-Late Neolithic, 7th-6th millennium), a wide conquest of arid margins occurred while large villages collapsed in the Fertile Crescent. Early hypotheses posited that population movements reflected demographic pressure and took place from the western greener valleys to eastern steppes. Despite a nowadays agreement on more dynamic processes of multi-directional cultural interchanges, the complexity of this wide phenomenon remains to be understood. To achieve this goal and thanks to an integrative approach, MARGINS aims to propose renewed scenarios of ‘conquest’ and to clarify its factors of influence, in particular the respective impacts of environmental components and socio-economic choices. To do so, the project will investigate settlement patterns and land use through subsistence activities and their adaptations to constraints of arid contexts. As an impetus for the project, I question in particular the role of the pastoral nomadism, later considered as a marginal way of life, as a central driving force for this sustainable occupation of arid lands, and the status of the Syrian steppes as a cradle for the conquest towards the south, in Jordan. The project will rely for the first time for the period and region under study on a multi-scalar and diachronic approach of socio-economic mechanisms implemented thanks to quantitative and spatial analyses with the help of statistics, GIS and remote sensing technics. MARGINS will break through barriers that have prevented a “big picture approach” of the Neolithic ‘conquest’ of near eastern arid lands by bringing together an unprecedented combination of methods, interdisciplinary specialists and renown international institutions – the CNRS research unit CEPAM in France and the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago in the USA – involved in the processing of the largest set of raw archaeological data gathered both in Syria and in Jordan in the past 50 years.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- natural sciences earth and related environmental sciences physical geography cartography geographic information systems
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
H2020-EU.1.3. - EXCELLENT SCIENCE - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme -
H2020-EU.1.3.2. - Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
MSCA-IF - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (IF)
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) H2020-MSCA-IF-2020
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
75794 PARIS
France
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.