CORDIS provides links to public deliverables and publications of HORIZON projects.
Links to deliverables and publications from FP7 projects, as well as links to some specific result types such as dataset and software, are dynamically retrieved from OpenAIRE .
Deliverables
D61 will establish a local Steering Group will be established at each Action Site consisting of the Task Lead the local partner institutions local NGOs and environmental interests and other informed parties that can agree and oversee a programme of activities including the input from the stakeholder engagement The Steering Group will meet 34 timesyr This will provide the local personnel logistical and physical supports needed to provide for the engagement of all local stakeholders as set out in WP2 and to transform this engagement from an understanding of the local context into the proactive codesign of restoration actions
Formalised coordination strategy with other Green Deal projects (opens in new window)For D85 a formalised coordination plan with other EU projects will be composed As part of this the partners in WaterLANDS will continuously collaborate to create synergies and cooperate with other projects and initiatives of interest that might provide significant leveraging effect to the project and to the H2020 call that funded it including Horizon Europe activities such as the European Partnerships and Missions In particular continuous collaboration will be established with those projects funded under the same call GD71 to build a research and innovation cluster aiming to maximize the impact and outcomes exploitation of the 4 projects
Deliver initial visible onsite restoration and evidence that requirements for upscaling have been met (opens in new window)D6.4 will deliver on-the-ground restoration at Action Sites that can be scaled up over larger landscape areas. The task will reference the physical restoration plans from WP6.21 and garner the support of the taskforce established in WP6.2, converting these outputs into the delivery of science-based and community co-designed restoration with a view to delivering first visible results by at least end-2024 (M24) as exemplars that demonstrate how landscape-scale restoration can be achieved. The collection of baseline data that is not already available will commence in the Action Site using local resources available to the Action Site partners.Physical works will be undertaken at each site that could involve site protection works, drain blocking, restoration of water flows or hydrology, reinstatement of wetland plant communities, new habitat creation or activities to facilitate the return of former species. These actions will be based on the plans prepared in WT6.21 and informed by the community engagement and needs of local stakeholders as identified and agreed in WT6.12. This will result in the restoration of areas of wetland and the rehabilitation of former ecosystem services. Appropriate performance indicators as described by WP1 (1.1), and identified locally in Task 6.21, will be monitored. This monitoring will also provide information on how physical conditions and biodiversity respond to the upscaling. For example, as the area undergoing restoration expands, we would expect new local micro-habitats to appear or for the wetland to reach thresholds capable of supporting species such as raptors needing large territories. It is envisaged that the project will demonstrate successful and sustainable restoration within targeted areas of the wetlands. These can be areas which can either yield effective results in the short term, or which can be used to demonstrate how challenges which are more pervasive to the entire site can be overcome. Hence, these areas will achieve visible restoration in their own right, but also reveal how upscaling can be achieved at EU level too. The restoration will be supported by on-going public engagement, detailed reporting and evidence of beneficial outputs, that can underpin the case for maintaining funding to sustain the process. WaterLANDS will keep abreast of the nature restoration targets that emerge from the recent consultation on the EU Biodiversity Strategy to ensure that these are encompassed in the indicators applied locally where appropriate to the Action Sites. Strong interaction with WP1 is expected, in developing ecological metrics, in addition to implementing the adaptive management plan of WP2
D2.3 follows on from the preceding deliverable in examining stakeholder relationships with wetlands, but will also include a focus on the economic value (income and employment) of existing activities in the Action Sites and the governance and policy frameworks that support them (WP3). It will likewise draw on the restoration solutions and mapping of ecosystem services included in WP1.3, particularly those of an instrument nature, and will input to the identification of financial measures for restoration solutions in WP4.Sub-Task 2.3.1. Understanding existing and potential economic returns from wetland activities (Lead UNIVE)This will integrate the information on socio-economic context and socio-cultural values, both qualitative and quantitative, from Task 2.2 and combine this with estimates of economic returns from existing activities, on site or within catchments, that have direct or indirect effects on wetlands, and will include activities such as agriculture, fishing and industries or tourism. The economic and social benefits and costs of alternative restoration scenarios (including opportunities for new sustainable systems such as paludiculture or low intensity grazing, renewable energy or tourism) will be investigated for each Action Site. Their potential returns and future sustainability will be compared with the contribution made by existing activities to the local economy and employment. The benefits of both sets of activities will be compared with respect to external environmental costs deriving from excess use or mismanagement of resources, and social costs related to distributional effects and equity issues (informing also WP1). Some use of benefit transfer methods may be used based on the Knowledge Sites where data is not available for Action Sites. Given the need to consider relatively long timeframes (e.g. when considering the profitability of investments), a scenario analysis will be undertaken based on various prospective solutions. Scenarios will be characterised by assumptions and hypotheses about the extent and type of restoration and future assumptions for exogenous drivers such as policy, market and climate.Sub-Task 2.3.2. Exploring a Just Transition through PMCA (Lead UNIVE)As some current activities may not be compatible with wetland restoration, this subtask has the objective of identifying ways forward that achieve a ‘just transition’ without significantly disadvantaging any one group of stakeholders. Based on the information on socio-cultural values and criteria emerging from Task 2.2, this subtask will use participatory multi-criteria analysis (PMCA) to work towards a consensus position. The benefits from restoration could include the enhancement of ecosystem services that improve water quality, provide flood mitigation, etc. Depending on local contexts, including the policy and governance frameworks being assessed concurrently by WP3, PMCA would complement and contribute to 2.3.1 by providing more comprehensive data for cost-benefit (CBA) or cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA).Various mechanisms to achieve the proposed changes can be considered by both 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 and be discussed in D2.3. These may include environmental transfer payments, payments for ecosystem services, carbon financing, and biodiversity offsetting. The design of such mechanisms, and estimates of their value, will be examined further in WP4.
Assessment and recommendations for economic incentives at Action Sites (opens in new window)D4.2 will assess relevant economic incentives for the Action Sites. It will begin by building investment cases for commercial and blended finance that can extend wetland restoration in at least two Action Sites, applying the lessons and methodologies from Task 4.1. The strongest cases will be consolidated; business models will be defined, and commercial financing instruments prepared. Possible options apparent at this stage include: carbon peatland instruments (e.g. Ireland, Estonia), water incentives (Ireland), flood mitigation (Bulgaria), sustainable rice production and hydrological tools for carbon sequestration (Camargue, France); and flood control (Estonia, Netherlands). Activities will include helping stakeholders to understand optimum business models for wetland restoration, assisting the development of clear landscape visions and business/investment propositions, preparing strong investment cases, engaging anchor partners and pitching to key investors and providers of services (e.g. water).
SMART indicators for quantifying wetland resilience and services and relevance to Action Sites (opens in new window)D1.1 will examine the baseline data and identify indicators that can be used to demonstrate and measure change in the key characteristics that provide for resilience in wetland ecosystems and which permit them to provide beneficial ecosystem services. These indicators will form the basis of a framework to monitor the wetlands’ changing status along a trajectory of post-restoration recovery. For this task, we will combine literature-based knowledge with existing and process-based data from the Knowledge Sites covering a range of degradation and restoration states in palustrine and estuarine European wetland types, as well as land-use and climate indicators. We will likewise develop quantitative measures to assess progress towards target states for key ecosystem services. These targets, and trajectories toward the target state, will be defined and finalised in cooperation with WP2, 3 and 4, taking account of the objectives of the EU Green Deal and the EU Biodiversity Strategy. Targets will be linked to existing conditions and to Natura 2000 habitat types and their configuration at a landscape scale, and be oriented towards the provision of, and potential for, desired ecosystem services.At site level, the first step will be to use easy-to-measure environmental indicators related to ecosystem structure (cover of relevant plant functional groups, such as Sphagnum mosses, shrubs, sedges), biodiversity (flora, birds, insects, mammals), soil (e.g. pH, organic matter content), water status (abundance of open water, mean water level, water level range) and their dynamics. To further connect the ecosystem structure with functions we will use a functional trait approach in which measurable indicators are calculated based on plant composition at different spatial scales. Drawing on existing knowledge and literature, a set of traits will be defined as a proxy for key ecosystem services, including carbon sequestration, litter decomposability with climate service, provision of habitat for fauna, and pollination. The traits will be measured at selected Knowledge Sites and linked with the ecosystem services which can be measured by ongoing projects at these sites. We will also use these traits to define resilience, the operating space that allows the ecosystem to maintain its functioning under various pressures, and functional diversity at different trophic levels. The data collected will be added to existing trait data bases that can be used in combination with repeated vegetation composition surveys to evaluate restoration success. At a landscape level, we will use spatial patterns of vegetation, landforms and connectivity between habitats as indicators of wetland functioning and resilience .We will identify trajectories leading towards the desired target states by analysing change in the indicators in response to the restoration actions which have occurred in selected Knowledge Sites. We will use successfully restored sites to enable us to define process indicators for desired and undesired trajectories. The usability of these process indicators will be evaluated by an expert survey of wetland researchers and wetland practitioners (Task 1.2). The indicators of services and resilience will be applied to the Action Sites.This new way of developing indicators of ecosystem functioning is much more promising than current approaches in wetland restoration. Instead of focussing on the traditional detection of particular species, we will develop generic indicators of wetland functions that can be matched better with ecosystem services and scaled up at European level and beyond.
Drivers and thresholds of change for European wetlands (opens in new window)D1.2 will assess the direct and indirect drivers of change in wetland functioning and whether changes or reversals in some drivers will contribute to sustained restoration. Drivers include, for example, climate, water and land management, as well as community interactions (WP2), policy, and governance (WP3). The Task will assess the interactions between these drivers and their role in pushing wetlands across thresholds of change. In many wetland systems there are feedback loops and non-linear interactions between drivers of change and wetland function, which may result in catastrophic shifts between alternative stable states. If a wetland crosses a threshold or tipping point, then the reversal of a driver (e.g. reduced phosphorus input) may not simply result in the wetland functions returning to their original state. Therefore, in addition to changing the driving forces, other actions may be required to restore wetland functions. Hence, understanding the different drivers, their interactions with each other, how they influence wetland functioning, and identifying critical thresholds, is essential for defining the ‘Safe Operating Space’ for wetlands (Task 1.3). We will synthesise the scientific understanding of drivers of wetland change across disciplines and subject it to an external on-line review by wetland researchers and wetland practitioners (~ 200 people). Opening the evidence to external evaluation, it will support wider project objectives of co-creation (WP5) and dissemination (WP7) with regard to the understanding of the interactions between on-site drivers of change and off-site stressors) Drivers may be direct (e.g. water level) or indirect (e.g. water management and regional upstream abstraction policy), local (e.g. livestock grazing pressure) or regional (e.g. water abstraction elsewhere in the watershed/aquifer). We will also be able to extract information specifically about our Knowledge and Action Sites from this expert survey but will include a larger sampling of experts from other locations with similar wetlands to allow for wider applicability to the assessment for future upscaling.We will use the data and feedback to derive quantifiable functional relationships of the response of wetlands to drivers of change, including the indicators outlined by Task 1.1 for the Knowledge and Action sites. For example, we will quantify the upstream flow stressors or nutrient loading drivers that result in cumulative effects. We will also analyse the evidence for whether reversing/reducing different drivers of change in a recovery of wetland functioning or not.
Report on international transfer of knowledge on community engagement and the role of business (opens in new window)D5.2 will synthesise best practice in innovative solutions to wetland restoration based on both the European and international experience. All partners and all Knowledge Sites will be involved. The Task will build on existing restoration-related activities and reports, e.g. well-established networks such as Oppla, the EKLIPSE report of barriers to restoration, SER-Europe, Eurosite, technical support reports for EC on restoration, etc.Sub-task 5.2.1. Review of best practice (Lead: WI)First, it will review the literature on best practice for restoration, including both peer-reviewed and grey literature from former projects. Working with each of the WPs, we will evaluate existing guidelines and handbooks and publish a comprehensive review. The evidence will be made available in different formats to target the diversity of stakeholders and increase the uptake of best practices throughout the restoration community (Lead WI).Second, it will examine the international experience and has particular relevance to WP2 (engagement) and WP4 (finance). It will also include the transfer of knowledge from the global South, as practice in community engagement can often be quite advanced in developing countries with lessons for the European context. The sub-task will also include a review of the role of agribusiness, of disaster-risk reduction and Nature-Based Solutions, linking with the opportunities for financing being examined in WP4. This will be presented as 8 adaptable business models, an analytical report (M8) and an interactive workshop (M6) linking WaterLANDS contribution to large-scale restoration with initiatives in countries where expansive areas of land can be available.Third, using the information from the Knowledge Sites, other pilot projects and network platforms, this deliverable will identify the key factors from the European experience that make for the sustainable upscaling of restoration. The Sub-task includes links with Task 8.6. The sub-task will quantify the size, effects, costs and benefits of wetland restoration currently taking place across Europe, taking care to include a wide cross-section of experience, including the particular role of peatlands with their distinct carbon storage function. The objective here is to integrate information about the effectiveness of restoration, governance, community support and social processes, and funding, by comparing successful and less successful cases. Evidence will be collated from experts and actors via targeted questionnaires and interviews. These in turn will inform workshops for all partners with the focus on practical restoration solutions (e.g. restoring semi-natural systems and production functions vs. the restoration of wild landscapes), managing conflicting interests, and dealing with trade-offs and sub-optimal solutions. For logistical purposes, these sessions will be combined with the workshop proposed for 5.3.1.
Ecological and scalability plan for restoration at each Action Site (opens in new window)D63 will consist of a plan to undertake practical restoration planning and works at each Action Site The task will draw on the expertise and lessons learnt from the preceding WPs and from the Knowledge Sites including the twinning arrangements in Work Task 55 The restoration plans will for each site 1 identify the extent of habitat types protected species their value and relationships with ecosystem services 2 determine the effect of existing land uses and economic activities which are likely to have supporting or limiting effects on restoration 3 propose surveys and plans as are necessary for physical restoration works in collaboration with all stakeholders and 4 identify the physical restoration works which can best support the restoration of the ecology and ecosystem services of the sites based on an assessment of local ecological and hydrological conditions and the interventions needed to support the integrity of the site and its restoration potential
Characterise governance landscape based on knowledge sites' experiences, including a mapping of key policies. Devise ideal ‘theoretical' governance framework for restoration (opens in new window)D31 will identify the policy and governance conditions that contribute to the successful development and implementation process for ecological restoration of wetlands A theoretical ideal governance framework will be identified from i a review of the literature ii lessons learned from the Knowledge Sites by stakeholder interviews and review of project reports and iii a mapping of the key relevant EU national and regional policies The analysis will compare and contrast successful governance conditions and measures taken across the network of Knowledge Sites and which can provide for the Safe Operating Space for wetland sustainability identified by WP1 The Task will analyse the respective roles of government agencies including those with responsibility for conservation agriculture planning or disaster management and the various objectives both conflicting or complementary with regard to water quality and availability economic growth agricultural productivity health and tourism The role of the normative context of politics legislation and local administration will be examined in relation to the services realised by different stakeholders and the options that exist for shared or mutually beneficial goals Further significant use will be made of existing investigations on the governance of wetlands based on the experience of projects such as WETNET TUNEUP LIFE WETLANDS4CLIMATE Interreg NWE projects CARE PEAT and CCONNECTS Interreg Baltic Sea Region project DESIRE LIFE OrgBalt
Strategy for community engagement and citizen science at the Action Sites (opens in new window)D53 will identify models for communitybased cocreation Successful landscapescale restoration projects require that trust is built between partners and that a sense of ownership is created The Task will build on and complement WP2 with an understanding of what is important for different stakeholders Task 53 will focus on three interrelated elements 1 building trust 2 learning together 3 empowering local actors communities There is a collective need in the project to achieve solutions based on a common vision of joint discovery learning and working and agreed results that extends beyond the immediate engagement process at any one Action Site The subtask will explore the use of citizen science the powerful role of art in reseeing landscapes and the promotion of personal socioecological experience This task will build on Tasks 21 and 22 and provide input for Task 55
Report on deliberative process and stakeholder values (opens in new window)D2.2 will examine the relationships that local communities and stakeholders have with wetlands at the Knowledge and Action Sites, and how these interplay with restoration solutions (WP1), governance models (WP3) and financing systems (WP4). It will first review objectively the socio-economic context including those activities that represent pressures for wetland ecosystems, along with their consequences, but also activities for which there is a beneficial (or prospective beneficial) association with the wetland. All the activities carried out at the Action Sites are driven by contextual factors (such as historical uses and established land management) that have consequences for the status of the ecosystem. Drawing on the mapping of ecosystem services provided by WP1.3, this task will undertake an objective examination of the social and spatial distribution of the benefits, i.e. within the local population, and downstream, along with the adaptive capacity of socio-ecological systems and their potential for transformation. The task will also contribute directly to the community engagement framework model for shared learning and co-creation and the Action Site community engagement activities to be carried out in Tasks 5.3 to 5.5.Based on the stakeholder mapping in Task 2.1, this task will combine the preceding objective assessment with a comprehensive understanding of the plurality of people’s relationship with wetlands in the Action Sites, including economic and socio-cultural values, based on the IPBES diverse conceptualisation of values typology. The task will use deliberative workshops to explore the range of stakeholders’ values, from transcendental belief-based values to the instrumental values associated with ecosystem service outputs, as well as relational and intrinsic values. It will also examine the extent to which these are realised at the level of the individual or are shared within communities. A deliberative value formation approach will be applied within the workshops to identify the respective role of these values bearing in mind people’s experiences of living from, with and in wetlands. This task may be supplemented by surveys of a wider audience to compare the values of the broader community to alternative future scenarios using either qualitative or quantitative methods such as stated preference or factor analysis. Past experience suggests that values may be firmly tied to established activities and land uses supported by the institutional and socio-cultural context, but also that ambivalence can emerge with regard to restoration or conservation. To ensure that the engagement has relevance to all stakeholders and not just a conservation community it will be necessary to explore participants’ awareness of ecosystem services and their prevailing or potential relevance to local stakeholders. The information on socio-economic and socio-ecological context and on values will input to WP1, WP3 and WP4.
Safe Operating Space for wetlands to safeguard future provision of ecosystem services (opens in new window)D1.3 will integrate the results of Tasks 1.1 and 1.2 to estimate the Safe Operating Space of palustrine and estuarine wetlands and apply this concept to the project sites under future scenarios of climate and socioeconomic change. This will also inform the qualification and quantification of ecosystem service values at specific Knowledge and Action Sites in WP2. It will identify ways by which wetlands can be made more resilient to future climate conditions. It will inform the subsequent assessment in WP2 and WP3 of implications for local communities and the directions available for policy makers under different land-use change scenarios.We will spatially map current ecosystem functions and services at the Knowledge and Action Sites, applying the process indicators (Task 1.1), noting their sensitivity to direct and indirect drivers (Task 1.2), and by following a Landscape Ecological Systems Analysis (LESA) approach (Task 1.5). Remote sensing (ESA Sentinel) imagery of relevant conditions (e.g. greenness, surface wetness, topography index) will be included to inform a tool that can be used to upscale mapping to other sites. The maps and remote sensing products will be validated using targeted field sampling in a subset of Knowledge and Action Sites. This will entail a combination of point measurements related to ecosystem functions, services and drivers identified in Tasks 1.1 & 1.2 to capture both local- and larger-scale indicators in the wetland ecosystems and their surrounding landscape. The field sampling will be complemented with data coming from citizen science projects (Task 5.4).The maps will be used to explore how the current wetland functions and services change along gradients of climate and land-use, and in the restoration trajectories. This analysis of the Safe Operating Space will be primarily based on the Knowledge and Action Sites but may be upscaled to other sites using remote sensing data, depending on the wetland function and services investigated. For example, wetland carbon storage potential may be more accurately derived from satellite images than ground-based surveys. To estimate the recovery rate of key indicators of ecosystem functions after restoration practices, we will analyse a time series for these for a subset of Knowledge Sites using a combination of available field data and remote sensing.Finally, we will spatially record the potential provision of future ecosystem services for palustrine and estuarine wetlands using downscaled IPCC scenarios for climate and socio-economic land-use changes in cooperation with WP2, WP3 and WP4. This analysis will project how wetland functions and services may change under future climate conditions and identify changes in local drivers which can increase the resilience of wetland systems. This knowledge will be used in Tasks 1.4 & 5.4 to explore how the necessary changes in local drivers relate to restoration trajectories.
Review of business and finance models and market demand (opens in new window)D41 will examine European and international experience to determine business and financing options most relevant to the upscaling of wetland restoration in Europe and to achieve a transitioning of economic activity to more sustainable development Options will cover the full range of wetland types found in the WaterLANDS project This deliverable will define the rationale and evidence for financial supports that can deliver impact returns to State agencies and investors blending together publicprivate sector partnerships that can incentivise commercial investment in solutions that regenerate wetlands and their services and promote green economic growth A set of reports and tools will be generated refined through expert seminars and disseminated at key European and global conferences for the finance business and sustainability industries
Preliminary dissemination and promotional tools established and others proposed are represented by D72 A range of resources tools and activities will be developed and implemented for widespread promotion of WaterLANDS and its results amongst all relevant stakeholders including the general public These will include The development of strong branding and logo that will form the basis of a robust communication portfolio Promotional factsheets developed for general dissemination and project promotion that will be translated into local languages to be used across Knowledge and Action Sites to inform and engage local communities PowerPoint poster and country profile templates and a generic project presentation slide deck for events and conferencesA project website will be developed and maintained beyond the project lifetime to provide information on and access to WaterLANDS information results outputs and the project partnersProject videos to showcase the project to the general public these will include a project overview video at the beginning of the project M12 short videos that showcase the action sites and the work being conducted there M36 a final project video that will highlight key outcomes and achievements which will be presented at the final event M58Annual project newsletters highlighting project progress partner interviews news and relevant eventsSocial networking channels such as Twitter ResearchGate and others as relevant will be used to promote WATERLANDS activities widely via dedicated WaterLANDS accounts and via partnership existing accounts A project social media campaign will be carried out with the strategy for this outlined in the PEDR including allocation of responsibility identifying and building audiences risks and measuring impact and performance
D1.5 will collect and synthesise relevant published and grey literature into a shared database for use within the project. It will be designed at the beginning of the project, with the information gathered being used to inform WP1 to WP5. The database will also support a map of European wetland restoration projects, expanding the existing IUCN georeferenced and searchable peatland project mapping system across more wetland types. For peatland sites, metadata will connect with the existing PeatDataHub system which is an open data resource for the global community. This task will support identification of successful restoration pathways (T1.4).
Publications
Author(s):
Biedroń, I; Konieczny, R; Siudak, M.
Published in:
WWF Polska publication series, 2023, Page(s) 42, ISBN 978-83-67312-06-6
Publisher:
WWF Polska
Author(s):
Luis Santamaría, Julia Martin-Ortega
Published in:
Nature Water, Issue 1, 2024, Page(s) 564-565, ISSN 2731-6084
Publisher:
Springer Nature
DOI:
10.1038/s44221-023-00100-w
Author(s):
Hujala, Teppo; Peters, Jan; Ó Brolcháin, Niall
Published in:
Planetary Futures of Health and Wellbeing Conference - Book of Abstracts, Issue 15-17 June 2022, 2022, Page(s) 18
Publisher:
Finland Futures Research Centre
Author(s):
Cosier, J., Bullock, C., Martin-Ortega, J., Cohen, J., Giupponi, C., Venezia, Minooei Fard, B.
Published in:
Power to the peatlands conference 2023 Book of Abstracts, 2023, Page(s) 56
Publisher:
Care-PEAT
Author(s):
Santaoja, Minna
Published in:
YHYS Colloquium 2023 Book of abstracts, Issue Annual, 2023, Page(s) 30
Publisher:
Finnish Society of Environmental Social Sciences
Author(s):
Santaoja, Minna
Published in:
Abstract collection. 2nd International Conference for Sustainable Resource Society: Seizing a Sustainable Future., 2022, Page(s) 65, ISBN 978-952-61-4734-5
Publisher:
University of Eastern Finland
Author(s):
Daniel Hering, Christian Schürings, Franziska Wenskus, Kirsty Blackstock, Angel Borja, Sebastian Birk, Craig Bullock, Laurence Carvalho, Magda Bou Dagher-Kharrat, Sebastian Lakner, Nataša Lovrić, Shane McGuinness, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Agustín Sánchez-Arcilla, Josef Settele, Guy Pe’er
Published in:
Science, Issue 382, 2024, Page(s) 1248-1250, ISSN 0036-8075
Publisher:
American Association for the Advancement of Science
DOI:
10.1126/science.adk1658
Author(s):
Santaoja, Minna
Published in:
The Polish Journal of Aesthetics, Issue 69-70 (2-3/2023), 2024, Page(s) 77–93, ISSN 2544-8242
Publisher:
Institute of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University
DOI:
10.19205/69-70.23.6
Author(s):
Karofeld, Vellak, Tullus
Published in:
Mires and Peat, Issue 31, 24, 2024, Page(s) 16pp., ISSN 1819-754X
Publisher:
Greifswald Jyväskylä International Mire Conservation Group International Peat Society
Searching for OpenAIRE data...
There was an error trying to search data from OpenAIRE
No results available