Periodic Reporting for period 2 - RETHINK-GSC (Rethinking Global Supply Chains: measurement, impact and policy)
Período documentado: 2024-01-01 hasta 2025-09-30
However, structural weaknesses in Europe persist. European universities file far fewer patents than U.S. or Chinese counterparts, and corporate innovation is dominated by a small number of multinationals. These deficiencies could undermine long-term competitiveness. The EU should therefore promote knowledge generation in both firms and universities. Research shows that subsidies boost knowledge production, while tax cuts also support innovation.
Moreover, findings indicate that the link between knowledge creation and regional employment growth is strongest when innovation is broad-based and cross-disciplinary, cautioning against policies that concentrate innovation in few locations or fields.
Several studies show that flows of knowledge and goods are closely intertwined. Policymakers should therefore not treat innovation policy separately from trade or tax policy, but account for their interdependencies.
In WP2, researchers gathered survey data on knowledge transfers across firms and disruptions in global supply chains. In a first round survey, companies in Austria, Denmark, Germany, and Hungary were included, while the second round expanded the scope to also include firms in Ireland and Poland. A questionnaire was crafted based on pilot interviews and discussions with experts, administered via Qualtrics, with GDPR-compliant survey invitations sent out. The data set and stylized facts are described in a working paper, and the data was further analyzed in subsequent WPs.
Work on WP3-7 has progressed as planned using datasets from WP1 and WP2 alongside administrative register data from various European countries. Papers focus on relationships between GSCs in services and goods and firms' adjustments to increased risk post-negative shocks like Brexit or the Covid-19 pandemic. Further empirical work investigates identified relationships and the implications of GSCs on labor markets, innovation performance, and environmental outcomes such as green innovation.
Secondly, similar input-output tables are generated based on open-source software development, illustrating collaboration trends across different locations. While collaboration tends to gravitate towards certain areas, the decision on sourcing code for further program development shows no such concentration.
Another key innovation is the gathering of new firm level data from company surveys in Austria, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Ireland and Poland. These surveys yield detailed insights into firms' sourcing decisions, perceived disruptions, adjustments, and supplier relationships, particularly regarding knowledge transfer and innovation cooperation. Given the focus and scope of the survey, we have a unique dataset that is particularly useful for understanding the risks firms face in GSCs and their adaptive strategies.
Analysis of the KIO data (in a comparison with GSC measures in goods based on goods input-output tables), as well as the new survey data show that knowledge and goods flows are deeply interconnected. RETHINK-GSC research also shows that firms adapt supply chains differently in response to shocks These are novel and important findings with strong implications for policy.