Skip to main content
Go to the home page of the European Commission (opens in new window)
English en
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS

Potentiality and Essence: An Integrated Actualist Theory of Metaphysical Modality

Project description

Integrating essentialism and dispositionalism: a new theory of modality

Modal statements say what is, could be or must be true; what is possible or impossible; what is necessary or contingent. Depending on the school of thought, the criteria for which modality applies and why differ. Two principal "new actualist" theories of modality, essentialism and dispositionalism, suggest that modal facts are grounded in wholly actual phenomena. But both theories have been increasingly challenged over time. With the support of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme, the POTandESS project will develop an integrated modality theory that incorporates elements of both theories and avoids their weaknesses.

Objective

This project investigates the source of metaphysical modality, that is to say, it is concerned with the question: “In virtue of what are some facts necessary and others possible, contingent, or impossible?”.
In particular, it will focus on the systematic investigation of the relations between the two main “new actualist” theories of modality, which share the idea that modal facts can be explained by, or grounded by, more fundamental, wholly actual phenomena.

The former aims to ground modal facts in the irreducibly dispositional properties possessed by actual objects—powers, capacities, potentialities, and so on. In its simplest terms, it states that something is possible if and only if there is a (chain of) actual power(s) directed at it, and necessary if and only if there is no power to bring about the truthmaker of its negation.

The latter aims to ground modal facts upon the essences of actual objects: what must be the case follows from the nature or identity of the existing entities, and what can be the case is whatever does not clash with said natures. In its simplest terms, it states that something is necessary if it is part of the essence of everything, and possible if its negation is not contained in the essence of everything.

In recent years, each of these two theories has generated a rich and influential literature and have proved to be among the most serious candidates as sources of modality. However, their weaknesses have also started to become clear: Dispositionalism seems to have a hard time accounting for logical and mathematical necessities, while essentialism seems to struggle more in accounting for the kind of modal truths involved in the causal, dynamic, diachronic evolution of a system.
The aim of the current project is to develop an integrated theory, which incorporates elements of both theories and avoids their weaknesses

Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)

This project has not yet been classified with EuroSciVoc.
Be the first one to suggest relevant scientific fields and help us improve our classification service

Keywords

Programme(s)

Topic(s)

Funding Scheme

HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF - HORIZON TMA MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships - European Fellowships

See all projects funded under this funding scheme

Call for proposal

(opens in new window) HORIZON-MSCA-2021-PF-01

See all projects funded under this call

Coordinator

HEINRICH-HEINE-UNIVERSITAET DUESSELDORF
Net EU contribution
€ 173 847,36
Address
UNIVERSITAETSSTRASSE 1
40225 Dusseldorf
Germany
Region
Nordrhein-Westfalen Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Kreisfreie Stadt
Activity type
Higher or Secondary Education Establishments
Links
Total cost
No data

Partners (1)