The CORESIST project has focused on comprehending resistance to anti-gender politics and the role of coalitions, specifically by examining this process from a comparative perspective. The study compared France and Romania, two different countries in terms of political architecture, political opportunity structure, the institutionalization of gender equality at governmental level, but also regarding the historical development of their respective social movements for gender equality, LGBTQIA+ an women’s rights, sexual and reproductive rights. Through comprehensive research activities, CORESIST provided an account of the way resistance to anti-gender politics by mapping the actors who form resistance to anti-gender politics in each country, the relationships between them, their goals and strategies. Through this endeavour, a deeper understanding of the relationship between different social movement actors, feminist and gender studies researchers and political allies was achieved.
An essential component of the research was to identify in what ways the foregrounding of coalitions between actors contribute to strengthening and/or weakening of the resistance to anti-gender politics. CORESIST showed that while strategic coalitions strengthen resistance to anti-gender politics on the short run by pooling resources and skills, deep coalitions fortify resistance on the long run by stemming from activists’ engagement in complex communication and crossings towards different militant worlds enhancing profound ties between them. While in Romania resistance to anti-gender politics seems to be organized transversally – across different issues targeted, in France resistance seems to be organized sectorally.
Furthermore, CORESIST identified the challenges and tensions related to coalition-making such as: (1) oppressive behaviour within movements (especially racism and transphobia), (2) dissensions over autonomy (activists dilemma about collaborating or not with official institutions, governmental bodies, supranational entities), (3) the shortage of resources and the project-based work (which often led to empty coalitional structures, that nevertheless in some cases were reactivated when needed). Lastly the ER explored how did the different actors who form resistance to anti-gender politics articulate the relationship between the various issues targeted by anti-gender politics (sexual and reproductive rights; LGBTQI rights; children’s rights; gender; laws and policies against hate speech and discrimination). The project showed that while some sexual and reproductive rights, LGBTQIA+, feminist, anti-racist activists emphasize the collective history of reproductive oppression to articulate the link between their respective fights, the tension that stems from implicit exclusionary processes within movements reflect the difficulty to conciliate the necessity to concomitantly mobilise together and separately, to move beyond single-issue politics.