The main contributions of my work in pushing the state of the art forward are two new methods I invented for setting up the Hamiltonian described above and then diagonalizing it.
The first method stems from the fact that MQED uses a physical object called a polarization field to approximate the large number of electrons and nuclei in a particle with a simpler fluid-like description. The computational savings afforded by this simplification come with a side effect: the polarization field isn’t perfectly well-defined unless the boundary of the particle is treated with assumptions beyond the usual Maxwellian prescription. Such assumptions, often referred to as additional boundary conditions, are under active research and are avoided wherever they are not strictly needed. In many experimentally relevant systems, the polarization field’s lack of definition turns out not to be an issue when calculating observables. However, if a reframing of MQED using individual states is to be created, the polarization field needs to be treated as the result of the excitation of the states of the system, such that the system’s states cannot be well-defined unless the polarization field is also.
Therefore, after identifying this issue, I derived new boundary conditions for the particle consistent with both the requirements of quantum mechanics and the subfields of classical electrodynamics that treat boundaries with more care (for example, nonlocal dielectric research). These boundary conditions force the surface-perpendicular component of each mode of the polarization field to go to zero at the surface of the sphere, guaranteeing that the mode decomposition provides a complete reconstruction of the total field and prohibiting the oscillating nuclei within the particle from “spilling out” into the space surrounding the sphere. These new boundary conditions help to merge the disconnected mathematical frameworks of quantum mechanics and electromagnetism in a new and powerful way, introducing a “particle-in-a-box” picture of optical cavity resonances rigorously without forcing undue simplifications onto the system.
The second major challenge of my problem was mathematical in nature, rather than physical. Starting from the coupled light-matter Hamiltonian described above, one arrives at a diagonalization problem with a structure that has never been properly treated before. Specifically, working at the level of creation and annihilation operators that describe the input and output of quanta into the various states of the problem, the Hamiltonian separates into a series of independent subsystems based on angular symmetry. Each subsystem features N discrete polarization states coupled to N+1 continuous reservoirs that model thermal and radiation losses. Here, N is taken to be a large number. Existing techniques do not provide solutions except when the ratios of discrete states and continua are 1:N or N:1, such that I needed to generate a new solution by iteratively diagonalizing the Hamiltonian as a succession of coupled 1:N problems. Importantly, this solution method can be applied to a wide array of problems, such that this research can be extended to future coupled-mode problems.