Project description
The interplay between conscious and unconscious processes
Does consciousness resemble the tip of an iceberg, concealing a vast unconscious realm beneath it? Some researchers claim that we can execute any cognitive function without awareness, while others contend that only simple tasks can be performed unconsciously. Yet the field of knowledge concerning this matter encounters two primary deficiencies. First and foremost, it predominantly concentrates on collective-level discoveries, disregarding individual variations. Secondly, the research has solely scrutinised specific processes at distinct time points. The ERC-funded IndUncon project seeks to introduce a novel framework based on the concept that individuals might exhibit differences in their susceptibility to unconscious processing. This enduring characteristic can elucidate contradictory findings and offer fresh insights into the interplay between conscious and unconscious processes.
Objective
Consciousness is often described as the tip of the iceberg, under which a rich unconscious world exists. But is this metaphor accurate?The literature provides a mixture of contradicting findings, with some claiming that almost any cognitive function can be performed without awareness, while others arguing that unconscious processes are limited to routine, simple operations.Currently there are two gaps in this body of knowledge, though; first, the field has almost solely examined group-level findings, without taking individual differences into account. Second, it is based on studies probing specific processes at specific time points; no study to date has tried to take a more global approach, looking for common mechanisms that persist over time, and potentially over tasks.
Here, I aim at bridging over these two gaps, providing a novel framework: I suggest that individuals consistently differ in their Susceptibility to Unconscious Processing (SUP). I hypothesize that SUP is a stable trait that can explain conflicting findings and shed new light on the interplay between conscious and unconscious processes. Starting with a task for which evidence for stable individual differences exist, I suggest three possible neural mechanisms that can explain such differences. These mechanisms will be tested using electrophysiology, neuroimaging, and developmental studies. I also introduce a novel protocol for pitting conscious and unconscious processing against each other, and biasing this competition via feedback.Finally I will conduct a large-scale study testing the riskier hypothesis that SUP might not only be stable over time, but also across tasks.Together this study will provide a much needed, unparalleled systematic investigation of the reliability and replicability of key findings in the field.
This research strives for a paradigmatic shift in the way we conceptualize, study and utilize unconscious processes, laying the foundations for a new science of the unconscious.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2022-STG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
69978 Tel Aviv
Israel
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.