Project description
Analysing valuation systems and their economic and socio-cultural effects
Systems that quantify various aspects, such as pedometrics, time sheets, impact factors, carbon footprints, happiness barometers and risk assessments, are all around us. With this in mind, the ERC-funded Units project aims to analyse different valuation systems and their connection to the realms they measure. It delves into how the choice of a unit influences the numerical representation of human values by examining the characteristics of diverse units, measures and standards. Its focus is on ethnographic data collected from Oceania, using a comparative research design that underscores the importance of small-scale ethnographic analyses in addressing global issues. The project explores the concept that every measuring scale necessitates a unit of comparison, which has tangible, economic and socio-cultural ramifications.
Objective
We are constantly surrounded by measuring systems ranging from pedometrics, timesheets, and impact factors to carbon footprints, happiness barometers, or risk assessments. Quantity-assessment systems are always at work to allocate value to our actions.
This research project sets out to study diverse valuation regimes with an emphasis on their material and conceptual linkages with the worlds they measure. The project studies the properties of different units, measures, and standards to analyse how a choice of unit affects the numeric representation of human values. It approaches this task through a primary focus on ethnographic data from Oceania, but employs a comparative research design that draws out the usefulness of small-scale, ethnographic analyses for global issues.
The project introduces a unit-centred context-dependent approach. It assumes that the need to establish a fixed point of comparison is something common to all measuring scales: any yardstick of valuation requires a basic unit, a standard equivalent that serves as the basis of a scale. The “Properties of Units and Standards” (PrUS) research project sets out from the commonplace observation that the units used for measuring value are specific rather than universal equivalents, and as such possess properties and affordances that hook up with people’s social worlds and material surroundings in various different ways. This, in turn, makes the choice of measure a consequential act with material, economic, and eventually more far-reaching socio-cultural effects. In short, the project assumes that there are no “neutral” units, and that by focusing specifically on the base units underlying numerical representation on any scale, we can call attention to both the material and the moral, political, even cosmological ideas linked to particular measures. A measuring scale highlights some phenomena but omits or obfuscates others: its deployment has consequences beyond the simple act of creating numbers.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2022-COG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
Finland
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.