Project description
Optimizing interventions for diverse social context
The recent rise in intergroup conflicts underscores the critical need for effective reconciliation strategies. Social psychologists have designed interventions to improve intergroup attitudes and behaviours, but their success varies widely depending on the social context. Most research has neglected this contextual impact, limiting the effectiveness of these interventions. Factors such as conflict intensity, community integration, ethnic composition and social norms play a crucial role. The ERC-funded HEAL project addresses this gap by systematically examining these contextual influences. Conducting large-scale studies and field experiments across conflict-affected countries, HEAL adapts interventions to real-life settings. The project aims to develop a comprehensive framework for intergroup reconciliation, providing tailored tools for peacebuilding in diverse contexts.
Objective
The recent increase in intergroup conflicts emphasize the importance of finding ways how to reconcile members of adversary groups. Subsequently, social psychologists have developed evidence-based reconciliation interventions aimed at improving intergroup attitudes and behaviours towards outgroups. Even though intervention effectiveness and outcomes depend on the context in which people live, most empirical research on reconciliation interventions has ignored the impact of the social context.
The overarching aim of this proposal is to systematically examine the influence of theoretically crucial and pre-existing contextual features on effectiveness, processes and durability of reconciliation interventions: a. degree of conflict and perceived threat, b. degree of integration vs. segregation within communities in which people live, c. ethnic majorities vs. minorities, and d. social norms on outgroup treatment.
The project consists of four sequential work-packages. In WP1 and WP2, I will conduct large-scale longitudinal (online) studies in four European countries affected by conflict. These studies will test and compare the effectiveness, processes and durability of established (WP1) and context-adapted (WP2) reconciliation interventions on intergroup attitudes and real-life behaviours of ethnic majorities and minorities living in different social contexts. In WP3 and using field experiments, most effective and context-adapted reconciliation interventions will be incorporated into participants’ real life through intergroup contact and multi-media. After establishing the impact of the social context in realistic settings and using heterogenous representative samples, in WP4, I will develop and empirically evaluate the first theoretical framework for intergroup reconciliation.
This project will identify effective reconciliation interventions that fit a variety of social contexts and thus provide concrete and effective tools for peace-building agents.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2023-COG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
10691 Stockholm
Sweden
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.