Project description
A closer look at Sharia’s colonial legacy
European colonialism’s encounter with Islamic law, or Sharia, deeply affected legal systems in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Many scholars argue that European-style laws largely replaced Sharia, while others see the changes as evidence of Sharia’s adaptability. This transformation still shapes modern legal practices across the region. Understanding these shifts is crucial to grasping the complexities of law and identity in MENA societies today. In this context, the ERC-funded DeColSharia project explores how Sharia was reshaped by colonial rule. The focus is on legal reforms, court practices and legal theories. The findings will help to redefine views on Sharia’s evolution and add new perspectives to decolonial legal studies worldwide.
Objective
European colonialisms encounter with Islamic law or Sharia, the main pillar of the pre-colonial legal systems in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), has had a tremendous impact until today. The implementation of modern European-style legal systems has led, as some scholars claim, to the abolishment of Sharia. Others consider the legal changes through which Muslim societies have transited as a sign of Sharias flexibility rather than its demise. The principal question this project addresses is:
How was Sharia transformed by colonialism?
The question mark in the project title (De)Colonizing Sharia? allows us to deliberately leave open the extent of the continuities, changes or ruptures that characterized Sharia during the colonial and the postcolonial periods and focuses on the processes of transformation. The project relies on extensive archival fieldwork and the intensive reading of texts to investigate the (1) codification/legislation, (2) jurisprudence/legal theory and (3) judicial institutions in six MENA countries representing diverse forms of the colonial encounter. We focus on the agency of legal actors, provide paradigmatic case studies for comparative evaluation and reflect on the fundamental terminological and theoretical questions underlying how (De)Colonizing Sharia? can be adequately grasped, researched and described. More broadly, my team and I expect high returns by challenging the scholarship grounded in European terminologies, theory and academic traditions in close cooperation with our colleagues in the MENA region.
The project will, thus, break new ground by going beyond current approaches and claims, conducting in-depth and interdisciplinary comparative research on Sharia, and constructing a multivariable database of our outcomes. Its results will be highly relevant for contemporary academic and political discourses in Europe, the Middle East and elsewhere, and for the emerging field of decolonial legal studies.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2023-ADG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
99089 Erfurt
Germany
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.