Project description
Reevaluating physicality in virtual trails
Video links are increasingly used in courtrooms worldwide, but concerns are growing that the lack of physical interaction could undermine the legitimacy and fairness of trials. Critics argue that virtual formats threaten the integrity of justice, yet these concerns may be rooted in an overemphasis on physical presence, despite its ambiguous role. This issue is critical for legal security and public trust, particularly with the rise of virtual reality trials, which completely eliminate physical presence. The ERC-funded VIRTUTRIALS project addresses these concerns by examining the impact of physicality on trial fairness and legitimacy in virtual settings. Through an innovative multi-methods approach, it explores how participation formats, virtual justice rituals, and credibility displays shape the trial experience and outcomes.
Objective
Video links are widely used in courtrooms across the globe but there is a mounting apprehension that the legitimacy and fairness of trials are threatened by the diminishment of physical interactions this format entails. The problem addressed in VIRTUTRIALS is that current concerns regarding the threat video links pose to trials by diminishing physical interaction may not be substantiated by contemporary examination. Instead, these concerns may originate from a fetishization of physicality, despite physicality remaining an enigma. Given the centrality and importance of trials in democratic societies, this has important implications for legal security and the continued trust in the legal system. It is especially critical considering the impending shift to virtual reality trials devoid of physical presence.
VIRTUTRIALS will identify how physicality and the absence thereof shapes contemporary trials and participation within in order to show if and how trials can retain their legitimacy and fairness in virtual settings.
The state-of-the-art pinpoints three interlinked themes regarding physicality which inspire the research questions:
RQ1: How does participation format shape participants’ accomplishment and experience?
RQ2: What are the social ingredients of virtual justice rituals?
RQ3: How are displays of credibility and remorse understood and evaluated in physical versus virtual trials?
VIRTUTRIALS has an innovative abductive and interconnected design using a multi-methods approach, including ethnography, qualitative interviews, and a combined qualitative and quantitative analysis of written judgements. By uniquely drawing on a social scientific perspective with interactionist theory, it aims to analyse and challenge the current understanding of trials as face-to-face interactions. In today’s rapidly digitalising world, where interactions in virtual settings are progressively prevalent and intricate, VIRTUTRIALS contributes vital knowledge on virtual interactions.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
This project has not yet been classified with EuroSciVoc.
Be the first one to suggest relevant scientific fields and help us improve our classification service
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2024-STG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
22100 Lund
Sweden
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.