Objective
The biologisation of national belonging is one of the most underrated features of Romanian and Hungarian historiographies. While nationalism, conservatism and liberalism have benefited from sustained interpretation, discussions of racism, Social Darwinism and eugenics are ignored topics in the scholarship of these countries. Interest in race, Social Darwinism and eugenics was, however, more widespread in Hungary and Romania than historians have noted. While Western European eugenics is well documented, little is known about its Central European counterpart. My general interest in this project is to integrate Romanian and Hungarian eugenics within the general international debate. More specifically, I try to demonstrate that: (a) Any perspective on the professionalization of medical doctors in Hungary and Romania between 1918 and 1940 is extremely limited unless it incorporates racial thinking and eugenics and discusses the role played by medical doctors and medical associations in disseminating these sets of ideas; (b) The scientific version of nationalism medical doctors envisioned cannot be completely comprehended unless it discusses the ways racial and eugenic concepts have influenced the national politics of Hungary and Romania and it inquires into how discourses on national medicalisation and sanitation gained ascendancy in the domestic politics of these states; (c) Finally, the discussion of anti-Semitism in the interwar period in Hungary and Romania should include the modalities by which volkish biomedical ideology was used to legitimise anti-Semitic politics within the medical profession. Using the methods of social and intellectual history, this project will unveil one of the most ambitious programmes of `national medicalisation¿ in Central Europe. A very interesting, if unusual, perspective on the biologisation of national belonging in Hungary and Romania will emerge by analysing the eugenic agendas proposed by medical doctors between 1918 and 1940.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- humanities history and archaeology history
- humanities other humanities library sciences
- social sciences sociology social issues social inequalities racial inequality
- social sciences sociology anthropology
- humanities philosophy, ethics and religion religions
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP6-2002-MOBILITY-5
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
OXFORD
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.