Objective
On one hand, economics can be defined as the study of efficient resource allocation to alternative ends. On the other hand, economics can be defined as the study of rational choices. However, these two views of economics go hand in hand: the evaluation of efficient resource allocation is based on the idea of the economic agents' rational choices and both rely on the assumption that people have unchanging preferences over time. Current researches in experimental economics show however that people violate fundamental axioms that are at the basis of rational choice theory (RCT) and that their preferences change over time. In this line, philosophy, cognitive studies, psychology and sociology demonstrate that people's choices can be motivated by other than standard RCT.
Behavioural economics now tries to respond to some of these results by offering a modified theoretical and rational account of human behaviour. Yet, by doing this, behavioural economists fall from a "single-and-unchanged-preference-conception" to the other extreme of a "multiple" or "hierarchical-self-conception". The individual then turns out to be equilibrium of competing interests. The question thus is what becomes of welfare evaluations with this modified rationality and conception of the in dividual? I propose to consider individual choice and welfare evaluations when preferences change. However, I will base my considerations on the philosophical conception of personal identity introduced in an economic context.
The advantage of these philosophical considerations is that it reintroduces a coherent conception of an individual over time that explains how people change without becoming multiple. This will be an extension of my PhD, where I developed a "model of identity" that allows seeing the economic agent as changing her preferences without becoming inconsistent in her choices. One aspect of this research would deal with the gender-dimension of identity and its impact on choice and welfare.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences sociology
- social sciences economics and business economics
- social sciences psychology
- humanities philosophy, ethics and religion philosophy
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP6-2004-MOBILITY-6
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
OIF - Marie Curie actions-Outgoing International Fellowships
Coordinator
France
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.