Objective
The origin of the hedge funds industry goes back to a small group of people that began to invest in it. Over time pioneers turned to people similar to themselves in order to involve them in the industry. This makes this industry created in the image of their founders and constituted of a network of people close and similar to each other. Above all this kind of network formation affects the performance of this industry and its risk. In particular, it is important to analyse the idiosyncratic risk that is defined as the inability of the actors to see important trends issues on account of cognitive myopia. To assess the idiosyncratic risk is necessary to analyze the cognitive myopia of actors that is to analyze whether or not actors think alike. The aim of this project is to assess the idiosyncratic risk in the hedge funds industry by analysing the individual attributes, the social network linking actors and the actors’ perceptions. In particular, this project proposes to establish the extent to which the hedge fund market is open to systemic risk on account of cognitive bias of the actors and to identify which parts of the market are most at risk. To this aim this project will develop quantitative estimates of the networks of the actors that gives real insight into idiosyncratic risk. The project will look at the attributes of the actors and will be based on their network profiles in order to provide insight into what constitutes idiosyncratic risk and the profile of a winning manager. Besides, the project will look at the organizational and network data of about 9.000 hedge funds in order to investigate the organizational and network determinants of their performance. By looking at both the individual and organizational levels of analysis the project will provide insight of the social system’s patterns that characterize the hedge funds industry and their managers and will establish the dimensions of competition and risk at the basis of the hedge funds performance
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP7-PEOPLE-2007-2-1-IEF
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
EC1V 0HB LONDON
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.