Objective
Conservation biologists work hard to prevent species extinction and rely on robust quantitative methods to achieve these ends. Decision frameworks allow assessment of alternate management strategies for threatened species, and may rely on simulated population models where data are unavailable or unreliable. Bayesian inference can be used to inform decision frameworks, and has come to the attention of many biologists because the Baye’s approach allows expert opinion or informed priors to update models where data are otherwise unavailable. These require further testing, and this is often difficult where data for long-lived species are difficult to collect. Here I will use short-lived soil mite (Sancassania berlesei) populations in a laboratory environment to replicate subpopulations critically endangered black rhino (Diceros bicornis). By confronting Bayesian models with real data, I hope to test the robustness of priors in Bayesian models, compare this approach to more traditional frequentist approaches and gain insight into the usefulness of Bayesian in decision-making. I propose to take this further and use the knowledge gained to develop and configure a decision making framework for the management of black rhino populations across southern Africa.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP7-PEOPLE-2009-IIF
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
SW7 2AZ London
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.