Objective
Background: Biomedical research has important social and economic value. It helps to promote individual and population health, boosts competitiveness and innovative capacity, and thereby contributes to economic growth. Yet, biomedical research exposes study participants to risks. Research also poses risks to public health when the science is poor. The ethical acceptability of research therefore critically depends on protecting participants’ rights and safety, while promoting the scientific and social value of the research. Research regulations are designed to ensure that these requirements are met. -- Patient organizations, investigators, sponsors, and others are increasingly dissatisfied with the existing regulatory framework. Many call for a “risk-based” system of research oversight that matches various safeguards – including independent ethical review and safety monitoring and reporting – to the level of risk posed by the research (e.g. revision of the EU Clinical Trials Directive). However, it remains unclear what such a system should look like.
Objectives: 1) To address the ethical questions raised by risk-based research regulations, including the stratification of research risks and the relation between risk, consent, and the scientific and social value of the research. 2) To develop an ethical framework for risk-based research regulations.
Methods: Interdisciplinary study that combines conceptual and normative analysis, policy analysis, and expert consultation.
Target audience: Policymakers, research regulators, research ethicists, and others interested in the ethics and regulation of risk.
Impact: By calibrating safeguards and protections to the level of risk posed by a study, the envisioned framework will help to promote valuable research consistent with adequate subject protection. This is a prerequisite for responsible progress in health. The project will inform current policy and ethical debates both on a national and international level.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/euroscivoc.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/euroscivoc.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IEF
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
WC2R 2LS London
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.