The initial unpacking of the public good concept by stakeholders showed the diversity of perceptions of public goods related to the very different local specificities, the evolution of global issues (e.g. climate change) and the changing nature of the perceived agenda (e.g. world food needs and resources constraints). This conceptualization will be useful for identifying objectives of governance-making regarding public goods provision.
The mapping of public goods, carried out at the EU level and in 13 Case study regions (CSR) in different countries showed a high diversity in provision also depending on the specific public good considered. Local mapping showed a high variety of information available, with some types of public good benefiting of very good data bases and other suffering from little knowledge. The analysis of this information with stakeholders allowed the identification of about 20 hotspots that represents types of discrepancy between PG demand and supply around 5 main typologies: a) intensive agricultural areas with major trade-offs between resources and intensification processes; b) areas at risk of abandonment; c) areas with strong connection with users from urban areas; d) low intensity-low income areas; e) forestry areas with trade-offs between public goods and timber productions.
The valuation exercises yielded 13 case studies with demand-side exercises and 15 case studies with supply side exercises. Of these 8 demand-side and 7 supply-side studies have been based on survey methods, with around 4400 total questionnaires from farmers and households. The results confirm the positive willingness to pay by citizens for public goods produced by the European agriculture and forestry. The amount that citizens are willing to pay for public goods provision very much differs depending on the public good, but also across areas and groups, showing the importance of segmentation of different demand components. The result also show that the current amount of money devoted by the CAP to public good provision is generally considered as acceptable by EU households (with more than 60% of citizens agreeing with the current expenditure devoted to that aim). The supply side valuation shows high heterogeneity of supply costs, further amplified by the acceptability of different mechanisms. From a methodology perspective, a wide variety of valuation methods has been used, from stated preference methods, multicriteria analysis, revealed preference methods, to cost/benefits accounting. The use of different methods is relevant to elicit advantages and disadvantages of them for the valuation of public goods provided by AFS.
The participatory evaluation of mechanism in 17 case studies revealed 3 main optimisation pathways for governance mechanism: 1) to improve financial incentives; 2) to improve the orchestration of different and better mechanisms in mechanisms mixes; 3) to develop bottom-up approaches such as collective actions and embed them in existing regional network mechanisms such as the LEADER approach. The effectiveness of financial incentives could be particularly enhanced by better targeting, while new and more performance-oriented schemes could replace classic linear area payments (e.g. PES). While financial incentives represent keystones in the governance strategies, the adoption of PG-friendly management strongly depends on supporting instruments, such as collaboration between stakeholder, market driven instruments, education and information and awareness building. Bottom-up approaches, such as collective actions, can have high potential, but they are strongly dependent on the commitment of the partners united under the approach and therefore only recommendable if compliance to the fundamental principles of collaboration are guaranteed.
The activity aimed at the development of a PROVIDE policy support and knowledge transfer tool, initial investigated existing tools and potential functionalities as well as stakeholders and end-users information and knowledge demands and needs was carried out. This conceptual development phase consisted of a review of the existing support tools and a series of workshops with European (2 WS) and regional level stakeholders (13 WS).
As a result, a range of needs was identified at the regional and EU level. Based on this the toolbox was developed and is now accessible via the website
http://provideknowledgeplatform.eu/(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre). It delivers smart and transferable solutions, mainly co-evaluated innovative policy tools and mechanisms, to meet a smart production of public goods, consistent with the current needs of productivity, bioeconomy strategy and rural development. The toolbox puts together an inventory of options, operational means for valuation and evaluation, and a selection of policy/sector mechanisms addressed in the five topic clusters and the categorized case studies. Research results and facts can be drawn from well comprehensible infographics.
