The project makes an original contribution to the study of work in the mining industry, which has broader significance for research on foreign investments and the development of global capitalism. The relation between capital and labour is a longstanding area of research in mining studies since the 1950s. The main focus of this body of literature has been the ability of workers to create a world of their own in the mines, and the development of a militant working class consciousness. For various reasons, this interest in class politics has tended to fade into the background in the literature on the most recent mining boom, which was accompanied by the rise of more capital-intensive mining projects. In this context, researchers’ attention has been largely concentrated on the new type of relationships that mining companies develop with local communities in the Global South.
In undertaking an ethnography of labour management practices, of the internal workings of trade unions, and of the everyday life of workers, the project has sought to put work back at the centre of mining studies while distancing itself from a research agenda in terms of class-making. To study the changes caused by new mining projects in the Central Africa Copperbelt, the team has consistently developed an approach from below, centred on the ‘micropolitics of work’. Its aim was to understand how the development of mining projects is supported, constrained and shaped by human resource managers, trade unionists, workers, and various categories of state representatives. This approach has considerable implications for the study of mining projects. From this perspective, mining companies are not viewed as external monolithic institutions that enter into relationships with local communities while developing new extractive projects, an implicit view in most of the literature. Instead, extractive projects are studied as being themselves co-produced by various actors both inside and outside mining companies, from the very first steps that foreign investors take in the country.
Finally, the project aimed to shed comparative light on the micropolitics of work among the companies that have developed new mining projects in the Central African Copperbelt in the last twenty years. Far from exclusively pointing to national differences, the factors involved in the micropolitics of work also include determinants associated with geology, infrastructural geography, or power struggles at play at other levels such as those between financial markets and mining companies. To compare mining projects from below through a focus on the micropolitics of work makes it possible to take into account the diversity of mining projects and, in doing so, to develop a more complex understanding of the labour regime that is emerging in the global mining industry.