Results obtained from addressing each objective
(1) Which features of three distinct fungal cell types contribute to cell heterogeneity;
We have found that almost all cell types and markers in this study showed heterogeneity.
We tested for cell size and cell wall composition with specific antibodies and lectins.
Heterogeneity was shown in each developmental stage (i.e. dormant spores, swollen spores or germlings) analysed.
This heterogeneity within the cell population was maintained through development. For example, when single spore from a heterogeneous population was allowed to germinate and form a colony and produce spores again, these new spores had a similar level of heterogeneity as in the parental population.
(2) Which cell types and subpopulations of these cells show highest resistance or survival against antifungals
We have observed that some cells are more resistant to caspofungin treatment than others. However, I still need to perform more data analysis to be able to tell which characteristics these resistant cells possess.
(3) The roles of septal plugging and cell ploidy in the mechanistic basis of fungal cell heterogeneity.
We tried to study ploidy (i.e. the number of chromosomes per cell), but it was technically very hard to perform this analysis in a high throughput mode.
Alternatively, we tested the effect of fungal cell heterogeneity on phagocytosis (the uptake of germlings by immune cells called macrophages and assessed whether epigenetics played a role in the origin of cell heterogeneity.
We found that specific spores were not taken up by macrophages.
By studying cell heterogeneity in epigenetic mutants, we have indications that epigenetics are involved in the emergence of cell heterogeneity.
Dissemination
-This work will be published as 3 independent journal publications
-The work was presented at the Fungal Cell Wall conference 2015, Paris
-I was involved in public engagement during Science Spectacular 2016, Manchester Museum