Skip to main content
Ir a la página de inicio de la Comisión Europea (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)
español español
CORDIS - Resultados de investigaciones de la UE
CORDIS

OPENing UP new methods, indicators and tools for peer review, impact measurement and dissemination of research results

CORDIS proporciona enlaces a los documentos públicos y las publicaciones de los proyectos de los programas marco HORIZONTE.

Los enlaces a los documentos y las publicaciones de los proyectos del Séptimo Programa Marco, así como los enlaces a algunos tipos de resultados específicos, como conjuntos de datos y «software», se obtienen dinámicamente de OpenAIRE .

Resultado final

Training Plan (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

This will be a living document presenting a continuous plan for training: how and what media to use, locations, who to address.

Updated Exploitation and Sustainability Plan (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

This deliverable will present the updated version of the D2.3.

Use Cases and Pilots: Definition of Methodology (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Description of the pilotscoordination and evaluation methodology. Detailed planning on which communities to be involved

Policy report on peer review, impact measurement and novel dissemination practices (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Final report that includes the analysis after the input of the focus groups.

Role description: Dissemination to businesses and the public (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Report on the skill profile for a newly emerging role of open science communication

Final project report (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

The final project report will describe how objectives were achieved, which difficulties complicated the project and which further perspectives arise from its final state.

Report on Final taxonomy linking channels of dissemination and altmetrics (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Document describing the results and the practical guidelines

Final Use Cases Evaluation Report (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Consolidated report on the evaluation results from tasks T6.2, T6.3, T6.4

Specific policy report on gender issues in peer review, impact measurement and dissemination activities (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Final report that includes the analysis after the input of the focus groups

Practices evaluation and mapping: Methods, tools and user needs. KNOW (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

A summary of the evaluation of methods and tools as well as a mapping of user needs and requirements for current and future methods and respective tools.

Application framework and transformation scenarios for open peer review (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

A conceptual model for (open) peer review, its step-wise implementation and evaluation during operation, covering methods and tools in different scenarios (based on the outcomes of the workshop conducted in T3.3).

Project handbook (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Includes quality assurance & risk management plan

Completed policy review and mapping & field research activities (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Document that describes the results of the desk and field research

Interim Use Cases Evaluation report (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

on the evaluation results from tasks T6.2, T6.3, T6.4

Altmetrics status quo (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Literature overview on altmetrics and indicators to assess impact and quality of research

Final report on researcher impact (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Results and recommendations for input in WP6 and WP7

Open Peer Review: Good practices and lessons learned (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

A study that provides insights into current practices, classifies and assesses methods and tools, and provides scenario-based case studies

Dissemination plan (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

This plan will include the general dissemination strategy – what to disseminate, and to whom; how to engage all actors, what materials, etc.). It will also present a first approach to exploitation, in relation to the expected project outcomes.

Innovative dissemination methods: Good practices and lessons learned (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

A study that provides insights into current practices, classifies and assesses methods and tools, and provides scenario-based case studies.

Policy review work methodology (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Document that describes the detailed plans and expected outcomes of the planned policy recommendations. Who to involve, when, where and how.

Interim report on taxonomy linking channels of dissemination and altmetrics indicators (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Document describing the methodology approach

Interim report on researcher impact (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Methodology definition and detailed planning

Practices evaluation and mapping: Methods, tools and user needs. UGOE (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

A summary of the evaluation of methods and tools as well as a mapping of user needs and requirements for current and future methods and respective tools.

Exploitation and Sustainability Plan (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

This deliverable will present the concrete actions that the consortium as a whole and individual partners will put in place to ensure sustainability after the project ends

A specification of the scientific method and scientific communication (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

This be a wiki based deliverable, and regularly updated until the end of the project

Data management plan (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

This report will specify how research publications and data will be collected, processed, monitored, catalogued, and disseminated during the project lifetime.

Publicaciones

Open Peer Review CMS Support (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Autores: Oliver Zendel, Matthias Schörghuber, Michela Vignoli
Publicado en: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration - OpenSym '17, 2017, Página(s) 1-4, ISBN 9781450351874
Editor: ACM Press
DOI: 10.1145/3125433.3125458

Foundations of a Framework for Peer-reviewing the Research Flow (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Autores: Alessia Bardi, Vittore Casarosa, Paolo Manghi
Publicado en: 2018
Editor: Zenodo
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1493152

Developing sustainable Open Science solutions in the frame of EU funded research - the OpenUP case (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Autores: Eleni Toli, Saskia Woutersen-Windhouwer, Electra Sifacaki, Natalia Manola, Yannis Ioannidis, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Edit Görögh, Michela Vignoli, Viltė Banelytė, Paolo Manghi
Publicado en: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration - OpenSym '18, 2018, Página(s) 1-10, ISBN 9781450359368
Editor: ACM Press
DOI: 10.1145/3233391.3233528

Own Nothing

Autores: Balázs Bodó
Publicado en: 2018
Editor: Radical Open Access II – The Ethics of Care

OpenUp Peer Review (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Autores: Oliver Zendel, Michaela Vignoli, Matthias Schörghuber
Publicado en: 2016
Editor: Zenodo
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.153936

Ten steps to innovative dissemination (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Autores: Tony Ross-Hellauer, Michela Vignoli, Elisabeth Lex, Hrvoje Lucic, Peter Kraker, Rainer Bachleitner, Viltė Banelytė, Edit Gorogh, Ilire Hasani- Mavriqi, Daniela Luzi, Roberta Ruggieri, Lucio Pisacane, Electra Sifacaki, Vilius Stanciauskas, Mappet Walker
Publicado en: 2018
Editor: Zenodo
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1315817

Russia is building a new Napster — but for academic research

Autores: Joe Karaganis, Balázs Bodó
Publicado en: 2018
Editor: Washington Post

OpenUP’s Open Science Pilots. Designing innovative peer review and dissemination pilot studies (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Autores: Michela Vignoli, Oliver Zendel, Matthias Schörghuber
Publicado en: Septentrio Conference Series, Edición 1, 2016, ISSN 2387-3086
Editor: Septentrio Conference Series
DOI: 10.7557/5.3975

Ten considerations for open peer review (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Autores: Birgit Schmidt, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Xenia van Edig, Elizabeth C Moylan
Publicado en: F1000Research, Edición 7, 2018, Página(s) 969, ISSN 2046-1402
Editor: F1000 Research Ltd.
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.15334.1

Testing Open Peer Review for Conferences (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Autores: Oliver Zendel, Matthias Schörghuber, Michela Vignoli
Publicado en: Septentrio Conference Series, Edición 1, 2018, ISSN 2387-3086
Editor: Septentrio Conference Series
DOI: 10.7557/5.4535

Are Funder Open Access Platforms a Good Idea? (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Autores: Tony Ross-Hellauer, Birgit Schmidt, Bianca Kramer
Publicado en: SAGE Open, Edición 8/4, 2018, Página(s) 215824401881671, ISSN 2158-2440
Editor: SAGE Publications Inc.
DOI: 10.1177/2158244018816717

Könyvtárak az információbőség korában

Autores: Balázs Bodó
Publicado en: Könyv és Nevelés, Edición 19|1, 2017, Página(s) 38-57, ISSN 0454-3475
Editor: Könyv és Nevelés

The European Project OpenUP: OPENing UP New Methods, Indicators and Tools for Peer Review, Impact Measurement and Dissemination of Research Results (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)

Autores: Alessia Bardi, Vittore Casarosa, Paolo Manghi
Publicado en: Digital Libraries and Multimedia Archives, Edición 806, 2018, Página(s) 240-248, ISBN 978-3-319-73164-3
Editor: Springer International Publishing
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73165-0_24

Library Genesis in Numbers: Mapping the Underground Flow of Knowledge

Autores: Balázs Bodó
Publicado en: Shadow Libraries: Access to Knowledge in Global Higher Education, 2018, Página(s) 53-79, ISBN 9780-262535014
Editor: MIT Press

The Genesis of Library Genesis: The Birth of a Global Scholarly Shadow Library

Autores: Balázs Bodó
Publicado en: Shadow Libraries: Access to Knowledge in Global Higher Education, 2018, Página(s) 25-51, ISBN 9780-262535014
Editor: MIT Press

Buscando datos de OpenAIRE...

Se ha producido un error en la búsqueda de datos de OpenAIRE

No hay resultados disponibles

Mi folleto 0 0