Within the InterTalentum Programme, we have organized two calls for proposals in 2016 and 2018, recruiting 19 fellows (one more than we initially planned). The success rate (ratio between selected candidates to eligible applications) was of 13.6% in the 1st call and 9.6% in the 2nd call, demonstrating the highly competitive nature of our Programme, and underlining the quality of the selected Fellows. Moreover, the large number of applications is the result of a rather intensive set of dissemination activities, among which we would like to undrline the following:
• Creation of a Programme website, incorporating apps for the online proposal submissions.
• A media campaign to promote our Programme, including radio interviews, press reviews and articles.
• Printed resources (posters and diptychs) were designed, realized and distributed in different venues.
• The Programme was amply distributed in our Social Networks (Facebook, Tweeter, LinkedIn).
• Our efforts to disseminate the information of our proposal can be gauged by the number of pages found by Google after a search for InterTalentum. Over 1.600 hits are found, many of which have been posted by non-national institutions all over Europe and abroad.
Thanks to our dissemination efforts, we received a total of 170 proposals for 19 offered positions with the two Call for Proposals, implying an overall sucess ratio of 11.2%, in line with some of the most competitive postdoctoral programmes around the world. While this relatively low ratio implies a good success in our capability to attract talent to our campus and in our dissemination strategy, it also created some difficulties to ensure a quick and fair selection process. In order to ensure that this process was fair, we designed and implemented a selection procedure consisting of the following points:
• The general scheme of the evaluation process involved two evaluation stages: In the first one, the proposal was sent to three external referees, that were chosen specifically for each proposal. In total, 535 reports were collected between the 1st and the 2nd call, all of which were anonymized and sent to the applicants.
• With the external Referee reports of each proposal, a short list of applicants was published. About 80% of the proposals were rejected in the first stage.
• In the second stage of the proposal evaluation, an external scientific committee, the so-called Scientific Advisory Board or SAB, took the leading role by interviewing all the candidates online and meeting in Madrid once per call to reach the final decision on the candidates chosen to become InterTalentum Fellows.