Linking micro- and macroevolution: macroevolutionary quantitative genetics of Drosophila wing morhology

Project Information

FLYWING

Grant agreement ID: 747338

DOI

10.3030/747338

Project terminated on 31 December 2017

EC signature date 9 March 2017

Start date 1 April 2017

End date 18 April 2019

Funded under

• EXCELLENT SCIENCE - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Total cost

€ 208 400,40

EU contribution

€ 208 400,40

Coordinated by

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO
Norway

Periodic Reporting for period 1 - FLYWING (Linking micro- and macroevolution: macroevolutionary quantitative genetics of Drosophila wing morhology)

Reporting period: 2017-04-01 to 2019-03-31

Summary of the context and overall objectives of the project

The striking mismatch between evolution at short (microevolution) and long (macroevolution) time scales is a major remaining problem in evolutionary biology (the paradox of stasis). In FLYWING, I applied novel quantitative genetic theories and statistical methods to analyses of exceptionally high quality data to make a major step forward to solve the paradox of stasis. I tested the idea that phenotypic variance covariance structure (P-matrix) provides the conceptual bridge to link micro- and macroevolution. Specifically, I investigated if and how P-matrix evolve in millions of years time scale. I found that P-matrices can evolve, but it does so slowly. These results suggest that P-matrices indeed provide a useful platform to link micro- and macroevolution, but its applicability might be limited to phenomena shorter than 5-10 millions of years time scales. Furthermore, I developed a novel statistical framework to test the relationship between the rate of evolution and the trait of interest. FLYWING gave me the opportunity to receive top quality research training from two world leading authorities of quantitative geneticists (Prof. Hansen and Prof. Houle), resulted in one publishable manuscript and one computer code to perform a statistical analysis. To sum, FLYWING has provided a remarkably positive impact to my academic career, and extended my future employability through acquisition of computer programming skills.

Work performed from the beginning of the project to the end of the period covered by the report and main results achieved so far

Work Package 1. Data exploration (Months 1-2)

I undertook a through survey on the fly wing dataset to identify outliers, potential ecological/life history covariates and to understand data structure.

Work Package 2. Investigate phylogenetic structure of evolvability (Months 2-6)

I measured mean evolvability, the ability of a trait to respond to a unit directional selection, of wing shape using the theory proposed by Hansen and Houle (2008). Time-calibrated molecular phylogeny including all 111 studied species is obtained from van der Linde et al (2010). I mapped the evolution of mean evolvability of female wing shape on Drosophilids phylogeny (Figure 2). Blue and red colors represent high and low evolvability in wing shape respectively, and branches were colored with gradient between these colors assuming Brownian motion model of evolution. I identified two lineages that have relatively high evolvability in wing shape: a clade of Hawai'ian flies and the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Male data showed the same pattern.
My result indicates that Hawai'ian subgroup and melanogaster subgroup have evolved higher potential for evolution in wing morphology than other species within the family. Hawai'ian subgroup is a remarkable case of island adaptive radiation with an estimated 1,000 species all arising from a common ancestor in the last ~25 millions of years (O'Grady et al 2011). Furthermore, the subgroup outstands by its exceptionally large body size compared to other members of the family (Figure 2). Thus, it might be the case that a high evolvability in wing shape is related to adaptive radiation. The melanogaster subgroup includes cosmopolitan human commensals (D. melanogaster and D. simulans) as well as island endemic species (D. sechellia and D. mauritiana). It may indicate that a high standing genetic variation in the melanogaster subgroup might enabled the cosmopolitan distribution and human commensal ecology of D. melanogaster and D. simulans. I am currently writing a manuscript based on these findings.

Work package 3. Developing the rate-trait model (Months 3, 7-9)

With my host Prof. Hansen at University of Oslo and a mentor Dr. Geir Bolstad at Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, I developed a new statistical model that relates trait(s) with the rate of evolution. I discussed with Prof. Hansen and Dr. Bolstad over potential evolutionary models suitable for this method in June, in Trondheim. We further exchanged ideas in October, in Oslo. We decided that a model that assumes a trait behaves as the Brownian motion (BM) and the rate is related to this BM trait. This model is the simplest evolutionary model among the models that we considered. Further consideration on model properties of this simplest model is necessary to build more complex models, where the trait behaves as more complex evolutionary models.
I and Dr. Bolstad are currently developing a program code in R statistical environment. In addition, to test the rate-trait model upon completion of program writing, I collected the data of brain size and beak morphology from approximately 2,000 species of birds. I will use this data to i) examine the details of model properties, ii) identify and fix computational problems in running the rate-trait model, and iii) test the Wyles' hypothesis (Wyles et al. 1983) stating that large brains are related to increased rate of morphological evolution. Our progress is still preliminary. However, I am expecting to generate at least two papers in a near future; i) description of the rate-trait model and ii) a test for Wyle's hypothesis.

References

Hansen F.T. and Houle D. 2004. in Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes, ed. Pigliucci, M. and K. Preston, Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 130-150.
Hansen F.T. and Houle D. 2008. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1201-1219.
Houle D. et al. 2003. BMC Evol. Biol. 3:25.
ven der Linde K. et al. 2010 Genet. Res. 92:25-38.
O'Grady P.M. et al.2011. Mol. Phylogenet. Ecol. 58:244-256.
Steppan S. et al. 2002. Trends Evol. Evol. 17:320-327
Wyles et al., 1983. PNAS. 80: 4394-4397

Progress beyond the state of the art and expected potential impact (including the socio-economic impact and the wider societal implications of the project so far)

I discovered that evolvability, here defined as the phenotypic variance within population, shows moderate phylogenetic signal. This result indicates that evolvability itself may evolve, and opens up further question asking in what situation it evolves and in what other situation it is not.

I initiated a development of a novel statistical analyses that relates trait means with the rate of evolution. Although similar approach has been proposed and applied recently (i.e. Cooney et al. 2017), this approach estimates the rate of evolution independent from traits and then test its relationship with trait as a separate step. In contrast, our rate-trait model explicitly models the relationship between trait values and the rate of evolution within a single statistical framework. Although our initial model that assumes the Brownian motion (BM) process on the trait limits itself to be applied for simple evolutionary processes, it can provide the basis for further development incorporating with more complex and general models of evolution, such as a Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model and BM with trends and bounds. Hence, our rate-trait model is an important initial step to build diverse models of macroevolution for the relationship between traits and phenotypic diversification.

I discussed and presented my findings in two academic conferences and in one invited seminar. In addition, I attended a workshop that advertises MSCA Individual Fellowship to Norwegian candidates, hosted by the Research Council of Norway, to outreach my experience as a successful candidate.

References

Cooney et al. 2017. Nature 542:344-347.

Wing morphology of Drosophila melanogaster with 12 landmarks analyzed in FLWING.

Phylogeny of 108 species of the family Drosophilidae. Blue and red color represent high and low evol