Periodic Reporting for period 3 - ENTRAINER (Enhancing brain function and cognition via artificial entrainment of neural oscillations)
Reporting period: 2021-02-01 to 2022-07-31
This project will mainly focus on gaining a deep understanding of a fundamental cognitive function in almost any higher-order organism: Attention. Attention is a fundamental executive control function that is critical for survival. It refers to our ability to selectively process the behaviorally relevant sensory information out of the large number of stimuli bombarding our senses (e.g. when attending to the road and avoiding distractions while driving a car). A fundamental issue that every organism faces – in both health and disease – is the limited capacity available to process information, which is referred to as “limited attention”. And this is precisely the main goal of this ERC project: To generate both theoretical and empirical knowledge about what constitutes attentional limitations in humans, by providing both correlative and causal links between brain function and the observed behaviour.
We expect to generate mechanistically interpretable neuro-computational assays for the characterization of “limited attention”. On the applied science side, there is a great need for technologies that enhance cognitive functioning or remediate the cognitive deficits of brain disorders to allow individuals to interact normally in society (e.g. psychopathologies related to cognitive deficits emerging throughout the lifespan, including during childhood, adolescence and adulthood), however, not in a data-driven manner as it is usually implemented (which are theoretically agnostic data analysis methods broadly construed including, but extending, standard statistical methods), but importantly designed using theory-driven tools that mathematically specify mechanistically interpretable relationships between brain function and behavior. Current treatments in neuropsychiatric disorders such as ADHD that are linked to cognitive deficits usually involve pharmacological interventions, but substantial evidence shows that individuals taking medication to normalize cognitive functioning typically experience adverse, nonspecific side effects that are not a direct result of the intended pharmacological action of the drug. Moreover, the disappointing results of extensive clinical trials in various psychopathologies such as ADHD desperately call for the development of non-invasive interventions other than pharmacology. In light of this evidence, it is of utmost scientific necessity that we formally understand the brain mechanisms that enable us to successfully guide goal-directed behavior in both health and disease. A systematic and mechanistic understanding of the link between neurophysiological signatures and behavior would allow us to consider non-pharmacological and non-invasive interventions that are completely different from current treatments.
Thus, in this project, I aim to establish a long-needed neuroscientific perspective that, first, will generate a formal and mechanistic understanding of the neural processes underlying distinct cognitive functions in the healthy brain and how they are affected by brain disorders, with the applied goal of developing neurocomputational assays that can detect deviant network interactions causally related to behavior. Second, based on these neurocomputational tools, this research will elucidate how novel neural interventions involving low-cost and painless non-invasive brain stimulation techniques may be applied with the aim of designing potential treatments of a wide range of neuropsychological disorders associated with deficits in various cognitive functions that are in turn linked to abnormal brain function.
2) Development of attention limitation theories for the study of human behavior: The brain is a metabolically expensive inference machine. Therefore, it has been suggested that evolutionary pressure has driven it to make productive use of its limited resources by exploiting statistical regularities in a given context or environment. In the first part of our research program, we have developed behavioral theories allowing taking into consideration attentional resource limitations in human cognition by trying to solve the following fundamental question: What determines the degree of imprecisions and biases in human decisions? We propose a new theory that solves this problem and when tested against real human data, we in fact demonstrate that humans optimally make use of their limited resources for processing incoming information and exploit environmental regularities to guide decision behavior. The results of our work may have far-reaching implications not only in neuroscience, but also in psychology and economics. Such models offer the prospect of explanations for seemingly irrational aspects of choice behavior, grounded in the need to represent the world with only finite precision. This supports our emphasis on the desirability of developing models of decision-making that account simultaneously for the organisms’s goals, its environment, and its biological constraints.