Based on the above findings, MUSTEC has proposed specific policy interventions and have developed a detailed Roadmap and Action Plan.
The work in MUSTEC have addressed concerns for five broad stakeholder groups, including (1) policy makers on the European as well as the national levels, (2) various market participants, (3) the European/global CSP industry, (4) the scientific community and (5) civil society.
The work performed has served to advocate the CSP technology and to stimulate the discussion about this technology at the policy level. The idea of a possible CSP cooperation project has been promoted at the national and regional level. At the European level, a Technical Assistance service offered by the European Commission (
https://www.hdcefenergy.eu/(se abrirá en una nueva ventana)) to potential c-b RES projects for the new CEF funding line has been granted to the Spanish Ministry for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge to further develop the MUSTEC cooperation project idea.
The work in MUSTEC has also addressed concerns for various market participants and the European/global CSP industry as well. These actors have been regularly consulted along the project and their views and feedback on our project outcomes have been properly taken into account and incorporated in our recommendations to further amplify the impact of the project. Impacts on the scientific community have also been promoted by the publication on scientific journals and the participation in scientific conferences.
A detailed sustainability impact assessment of a potential cooperation project was performed. Results obtained showed that the implementation of a CSP power plant will create value added and employment that will be mostly retained in Europe and that the electricity generated would have a low carbon and water footprint. There are, however, some potential social risks in the CSP value chain that need to be minimized. In comparison with an equivalent system in terms of flexibility and dispatchability that uses photovoltaic panels and batteries, CSP performs better in all the sustainability indicators analysed.
The project also investigated the geopolitical and energy security implications of CSP. We showed that despite significant advantages in traditionally “hard” policy fields, both regarding geopolitics (e.g. reduced import dependency) and energy security (e.g. a source of renewable dispatchability), CSP is a non-issue in European energy and geo policy. CSP is seen as a niche technology and the cooperation mechanisms as niche institutional innovations. In addition, CSP can be an enabling technology for the overall energy transition: because CSP can balance wind power and PV, it can enable the secure continued deployment of these technologies – thus enabling continued decarbonisation and further jobs creation in technologies other than CSP itself. Hence, fast-tracking CSP cooperation would be a suitable EU response to the COVID-19 crisis, serving both EU geopolitical goals and the aims of the European Green Deal.