During the period under review the consortium has:
‒ Undertaken comprehensive performance, environmental, and noise assessments of the concept FRC at airport and ATS level, against a reference vehicle.
‒ Analysed the performance of the Tilt-rotor aircraft (TR) and Compound Rotorcraft (CR) for Search and Rescue (SAR), Commercial Intercity Transportation (CIT), and Airport Hub Feeder (AHF) missions.
‒ Analysed the performance of TR performing offshore (OAG) and Cargo Transport (CGT) missions.
‒ Analysed the performance of CR performing Emergency Medical Service (EMS) and Door-to-Door Transportation (DTD) missions.
‒ Quantified fuel burn, emission, and noise deltas through detailed mission analysis.
‒ Undertaken mobility assessments to quantify and identify the suitable routes for the technology concepts.
‒ Quantified mobility improvements for realistic scenarios in comparison with conventional air and ground means of transportation.
‒ Conceptualised, adapted, and further developed physics-based models/frameworks to simulate additional generic FRC configurations, different in operational and design characteristics to the OEMs’ configurations.
‒ Utilised the models to explore and expand design space to identify configurations that may be further suited to achieving CS2 targets.
Overview of results for the generic fast rotorcraft concepts (ATS level assessments)
‒ Within the project and apart from the OEM’s FRC concepts, generic tilt-rotor aircraft (designated as NLR Tiltrotor Aircraft -NTRA) and compound rotorcraft (designated as DEPART compound rotorcraft-DCR) were modeled.
‒ The performance and environmental impact of both concept rotorcraft were compared against the Twin Engine Medium (TEM-R) helicopter, which was adapted from CS1 research.
The key results from the assessments included:
o Over the missions assessed, fuel burn and CO2 increases between 13 and 25%, due to the increased gross weight and flights speed of the FRC.
o When assessed using normalized metrics (Kilogram fuel burn(or CO2) / passenger * kilometer) benefits of up to 25% were observed and attributed to higher passenger capacity of the novel concepts.
o Low-NOx combustor technology was assumed and depending on the mission flown, NOx emissions (normalized) were found to vary between a disadvantage of 19% and a benefit of up to 40%.
o Significant benefits in mission time (of up to 50%) were observed.
o An investment cost viability analysis has also established the benefits of using FRC to replace conventional rotorcraft.
As part of exploitation and dissemination activities, research from the project and the associated results were presented at 6 international conferences and published in 2 technical journals. The project also contributed to the 1st CS2 TE Global Assessment Report.