Periodic Reporting for period 1 - MAPGenome (Mapping migration and adaptation in genomes)
Reporting period: 2018-03-01 to 2020-02-29
a) New theoretical results on the interplay of gene flow and selection. Since T. urticae is a haplo-diploid species, we derived analytical results and used SLIM v3.3 simulations for species with such mode of reproduction. Our results indicate that divergent selection is more efficient in haplo-diploids than diploids in models with gene flow. Also, we show that deleterious mutations (i.e. mutations with a negative impact in fitness) can lead to heterogeneous genomic patterns. Depending on the recombination rates, selective and dominance coefficients we predict a transition from associative over-dominance (AOD) to background selection (BGS). As a result of the secondment, together with Prof. Daniel Wegmann we worked on a bioinformatics method to infer variation of migration along the genome, which we expect to release during 2020 (publicly available on GitHub). These results were disseminated at conferences (e.g. ENBE, SMBE) and two manuscripts are in preparation.
b) To test theoretical predictions from a), we are performing experimental evolution, exposing mites to tomato host-plants in different environments with and without migration. We used simulations to provide experimental guidelines for studying adaptation with experimental evolution (published in Sousa et al. 2019 COIS). Since many host-plant species (e.g. tomato) accumulate heavy metals (e.g. Cadmium) as a defense against herbivores (e.g. T. urticae), we treat Cadmium presence as a challenging environment. We have three treatments: (i) no Cadmium (environment A) without migration; (ii) Cadmium (environment B) without migration; (iii) Cadmium (environment B) receiving migrants from environment A every generation. We optimized protocols for DNA extraction for pools of spider mites. We are measuring changes in relevant life-history traits (e.g. fertility, mortality, etc.) and genomic patterns through time. Preliminary results indicate that migration slows the rate of adaptation. We plan to submit a manuscript by the end of 2020.
c) To investigate these processes in natural populations, we have analyzed genome-wide population data from three systems: (i) recent divergence in stickleback fish; (ii) old divergence of Iberian freshwater fish of genus Squalius; (iii) divergence of bonobos and chimpanzees. Results were published in peer-reviewed journals, supporting that genetic signatures of past gene flow are widespread across different systems, pointing to its evolutionary relevance.
Finally, I was involved in activities to disseminate this MSCA results to a wider audience. For instance, I participated in FCUL Open Day 2019, Speed Dating with Scientists 2019, gave seminars for a general audience of students and researchers (e.g. Celebration of Statistics Day, Ecological Modeling Day), I gave two interviews for a generalist radio ( “Ponto de Partida” and “Dias do Futuro” – Antena 1).
Our theoretical results indicate that divergent selection is more efficient in haplo-diploid than diploid species, leading to different genomic differentiation patterns in haplo-diploid species, generating predictions that can be tested. This suggests that haplo-diploids, such as the crop pest T. urticae, adapt faster and tolerate more migration than diploid species. This has important implications as it can be related to the ability of T. urticae to use a wide-range of host-plants and evolve rapidly pesticide resistance.
Moreover, our simulation results suggest that background selection (BGS) is prevalent in haplo-diploids. Surprisingly, for slightly deleterious recessive mutations we predict genomic patterns consistent with associative overdominance (AOD), seen for diploids irrespective of migration. Importantly, we found that genomic regions of high recombination are not affected by AOD nor BGS and hence such regions can be used as a benchmark. This opens new lines of research, guiding developments to detect genes affected by deleterious mutations, which can have wide impacts, ranging from conservation to human genetics.
By combining my knowledge in genomics, with the supervisor’s knowledge in experimental evolution, we designed an experiment to quantify the impact of migration on adaptation. We quantified changes in life-history traits and in genomic patterns, comparing scenarios with and without gene flow. These results will be novel, as little is known about gene flow from studies in controlled environments.
In this project we applied genomic tools to address how crop pests adapt to novel environments. Results can help us predict how crop pests respond in scenarios with increasing levels dispersal and migration due to global change, including invasion of new geographic areas and new host plants. Characterizing the genomic and evolutionary processes involved in how populations adapt in face of gene flow is thus of utmost applied and fundamental importance.