Project description
Banks’ CSR impact on the environment
Banks, in their role as development partners, have a big role to play in the transition to a sustainable economy. Banks’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions are considered a vehicle for achieving sustainable development of business and the economy. Also, in line with United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) recommendations, the High-level Expert Group (HLEG) on sustainable finance (established by the European Commission) has argued to initiate a ‘climate-related financial disclosure’ on banks’ capital requirements. The EU-funded SUSBANK project will build on these by finding empirical support for the explicit acknowledgment of environmental risk as an emerging source of systemic risk. It will investigate the impact of environmental sustainability engagement of banks on their reputation, earnings quality, CEO compensation, long-term growth and, importantly, on systemic risk.
Objective
The need for more socially and environmentally sustainable financial system has never been more crucial than it is at present. CSR is considered as a vehicle for achieving sustainable development of the business and the economy. Presently out of all CSR dimensions, climate and environmental issues have come out as the single prevalent negative externality. Since banks are the development partners of the rest of the economy, anti-environmental engagement could be harmful for bank reputation, earnings quality, and growth. Further, CEO compensation is strongly allied with excessive risk-taking in banks. Thus, as the banks are strongly interlinked, any adverse event could severely affect the banking system as a whole through spillover effects and thus increase the systemic risk. However, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has not yet addressed the environmental issues in its macroprudential regulatory framework. Nonetheless, in line with United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) recommendations, the High-level Expert Group (HLEG) on sustainable finance (established by the European Commission) has argued to initiate a ‘climate-related financial disclosure’ or a ‘brown-penalising factor’ on banks’ capital requirements to address the environmental risk.
To strengthen the UNEP and HLEG arguments, the proposed research aims to find empirical support for the explicit acknowledgment of environmental risk as an emerging source of systemic risk. The proposed research is expecting to contribute in several ways. Firstly, to our knowledge, this is the first effort to investigate the impact of environmental sustainability engagement of banks on their reputation, earnings quality, CEO compensation, long-term growth, and importantly on systemic risk. Secondly, the position of EU banks will be compared with other regional banks on the related issues. Thus, the findings will provide significant insights for the policymakers to set a common environmental regulatory benchmark.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
H2020-EU.1.3. - EXCELLENT SCIENCE - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme -
H2020-EU.1.3.2. - Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
MSCA-IF - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (IF)
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) H2020-MSCA-IF-2019
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
LL57 2DG Bangor
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.