Project description
Ethical considerations of ML in healthcare
One fifth of the EU population has some form of disability. The EU is committed to improving the social and economic situation of these persons. Ensuring that they have access to culture, as consumers or contributors, is also important. Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in clinical care to improve diagnosis, therapy options and effectiveness of the health system. However, ML models use historically gathered information and exclude parts of the population that experience social, racial or gender discrimination, failing to provide fairness in predictive models and posing ethical concerns. The EU-funded FPH project will map the ethical theories related to the distribution of resources in healthcare and link them to fair ML. It will understand how usual moral concepts can be perceived in probabilistic terms and if existing allegations of fair models in AI are solid in respect to different philosophical perceptions of probability, causality and counterfactuals and demonstrate the relevance of these philosophical perceptions.
Objective
In clinical care, machine learning is progressively used to enhance diagnosis, therapy choice, and effectiveness of the health system. Because machine-learning models learn from historically gathered information, populations that have suffered past human and structural biases (e.g. unequal access to education or resources) — called protected groups — are susceptible to damage from inaccurate projections or resource allocations, reinforcing health inequalities. For example, racial and gender differences exist in the way clinical data are produced and these can be transferred as biases in the models. Several techniques of algorithmic fairness have been suggested in the literature on machine learning to ameliorate the performance of machine learning with respect to its fairness. The debate in statistics and machine learning has however failed to provide a principled approach for choosing concepts of bias, prejudice, discrimination, and fairness in predictive models, with a clear link to ethical theory discussed within philosophy.
The specific scientific objectives of this research project are:
O1: ethical theory: mapping the ethical theories that are relevant for the allocation of resources in health care and draw connections with the literature in fair machine learning
O2: probabilistic ethics: understand how standard moral concepts such as responsibility, merit, need, talent, equality, and benefit can be understood in probabilistic terms
O3: epistemology of causality: understand if current claims made by counterfactual and causal models of fairness in AI are robust with respect to different philosophical understandings of probability, causality, and counterfactuals
O4: application: to show the relevance these philosophical ideas by applying them to a limited number of paradigmatic cases of the application of predictive algorithms in health care.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
H2020-EU.1.3. - EXCELLENT SCIENCE - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme -
H2020-EU.1.3.2. - Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
MSCA-IF - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (IF)
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) H2020-MSCA-IF-2019
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
20133 Milano
Italy
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.