Skip to main content
Go to the home page of the European Commission (opens in new window)
English en
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS
Content archived on 2024-05-07

Pluralisme des fondements des positions de bioethique et fonctionnement des institutions europeennes

Objective



The objective is to provide the results of an analysis of the philosophical pluralism basing the various bioethical positions with regard to plant, animal and microbial biotechnology (non medical applications) in the EU, and the way in which such pluralism is taken into account by the European institutions, based on a case study; the directive on the protection of biotechnological inventions.
The project is pluralistic, transdisciplinarian and pluri-cultural in nature. This is why a concerted action has been chosen for its implementation. The main participants are experts in fields such as epistemology, philosophy, law, political sciences, biology ... They will be asked to produce a paper on the subject, based on their particular expertise and experience, and on their previous work. These papers will constitute the basis of a document which will then be offred for discussion in a workshop, together with representatives of different opinion groups in the EU (in a pluralistic manner). A summary of the discussions and recommendations to the Commission will then be produced by the coordinator.
It is observed that the debate between pros and contras on the applications of biotechnology is based on a simplistic dichotomy opposing, on one side, scientists and industrialists, all in favour of technological and economic development, and, on the other side, opponents who, explicitly or not, base their opinion on a particular philosophical understanding of nature, the economy or their vision of the decision-making process within the European inst itutions. The treaties do not take any stance on these philosophical issues, hence the institutions representatives do not dispose of a clear mandate in the field. Should they take one or the other, dominant or not, philosophical positions as a refernce or should they try and reflect philosophical pluralism in the decisions?
This is the main question addressed by this proposal.

Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)

CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.

You need to log in or register to use this function

Programme(s)

Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.

Topic(s)

Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.

Call for proposal

Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.

Data not available

Funding Scheme

Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.

CON - Coordination of research actions

Coordinator

Université Libre de Bruxelles
EU contribution
No data
Address
808,Route de Lennik
1070 Bruxelles
Belgium

See on map

Total cost

The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.

No data
My booklet 0 0