Objective
The project will provide the experimental and theoritical base necessary to design and safely use a range of precision abrasive jet machine tools. These tools will help in the exploitation of advanced materials, stenghten the EEC's manufacturing base and provide the basis for exports of a new range of machine tools.
Critical parameters for Abrasive Water Jet Cutting were identified and characterised during the cutting trials and subsequent measuring activities. The work has yielded a standard methodology to evaluate the performance of water jets for cutting parts in different types of material. During the cutting trials, the following defects were detected: overshoot, striation and material removal. These variables have a large influence on the final cut surface quality.
The innovative aspects of this work were to define, quantify and qualify the quality and cost effectiveness of abrasive water jet cutting with respect to :
- Surface roughness
- Cutting/profiling velocity
- Overshoot or Undershoot
- Abrasive and abrasive flow rate
- System pressure
- Edge taper
The project developed a standard test shape and defined an extensive array of test conditions including :
- 4 Abrasive concentrations
- 4 Abrasive materials
- 4 Abrasive flow rates
- 4 Cutting pressures
- 4 Cutting speeds
- 8 Sample materials (ductile and brittle)
- 2 to 4 Sample thickness'
A recommended Abrasive Water Jet quality standard document was proposed within the programme, establishing guidelines based on the French standard for thermal cutting (NF A 87-000).
The difference between both types of Abrasive water jetting systems in use has been examined and the increased efficiency of the suspension system (DIAJET) can be explained from consideration of jet pump efficiency and abrasive degradation within each system.
The cutting tests on brittle and ductile materials, have allowed us to establish a vast database giving the cutting results (edge quality and accuracy) versus the cutting parameters (pressure, abrasive, cutting speed, flow etc).
Mathematical models were developed for both brittle and ductile materials, and provide a good fit to the experimental data.
Guidelines for carrying out trials to test the suitability for Abrasive water jet systems for Aerospace industry use have been developed. However, in order to prove the fatigue requirements for the cutting of advanced Aerospace materials, further work is required.
The project has quantified the impact of the jet, once its exits the material being cut, on the surrounding environment. Subsequently, it has been possible to select material resistant to the impact of the jet and construct the architecture of jet catchers designed to collect the jet.
Two types of catcher, flat and cylindrical, have been designed the efficiency of such catchers has reached now a high degree of perfection, Four catchers (1 flat type and 3 cylindrical) have already been sold for aerospace and nuclear applications.
Abrasive water jets can cut a wide variety of advanced materials that are very difficult to cut using conventional methods. Exploitation of abrasive jet technology is being seriously delayed because of a lack of experimentally and theoretically based models of jet behaviour related to nozzle/workpiece/manipulator/catcher parameters. These models combined with a better understanding of the physical processes involved are essential to design machines to generate cuts that do not require costly secondary machining operations, achieve adequate material fatigue properties, produce acceptable surface finish and edge shapes and avoid scrap components caused by jets deviating from the expected cutting path. This project aims to : - establish the characteristics abrasive jets need to meet specific machining objectives - develop an understanding of jet/workpiece interaction and construct mathematical models of the interactions - simulate the manipulation of jet/workpiece to achieve required workpieces shapes whilst producing acceptable surface characteristics - provide models that will predict where and how a jet will leave workpiece so as to be able to catch it - develop new designs of compact jet catchers that can be manipulated by robots.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- natural sciences computer and information sciences databases
- engineering and technology mechanical engineering manufacturing engineering subtractive manufacturing
- natural sciences mathematics applied mathematics mathematical model
You need to log in or register to use this function
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Data not available
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Data not available
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Data not available
Coordinator
MK43 0AJ Cranfield
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.