Objective
To demonstrate the energy savings attainable by using fluidized bed furnaces to replace conventional ones in steel heat treatment. The fluidized bed is expected to replace the steel quench and salt bath furnaces in some applications. These furnaces and the fluidized bed have been monitored for this project.
Maximum energy efficiencies of +- 20% for the conventional furnaces have been recorded and +- 50% for fluidized bed furnaces, representing considerable projected energy savings.
Throughout the course of the project operation of the fluidized bed was unreliable and relatively poor energy efficiency is attributed largely to this factor. In the final year of monitoring it became impossible to demonstrate energy saving by use of the fluidized bed. Monitoring showed that only the seal quench furnace with a mean energy efficiency of 14.7% came close to predicted value. Fluidized bed furnace low mean energy efficiency of 3.2% was attributed to operational and supply difficulties. The furnace operated without a recuperative hood which would have recovered heat from flue gases, in the process providing heat to a gas tempering furnace. Rather than on a continuous basis the furnace was operated daily at a below capacity of 200 Kg, treating a small number of batches. In some cases the fluidized bed provided high quality heat treatment. There is every reason to believe that fluidized beds can be designed to operate reliably, to provide high quality heat treatment andbe more energy efficient that conventional furnaces.
The demonstration programme was carried out at Northern Heat Treatments, a firm specializing in heat treatment of various components. A G76M Fireball Mk 111 Fluidized Bed Furnace was installed. However due to the supplier's bankruptcy the furnace did not meet specifications. Considerable problems were encountered with installation and commissioning.
The fluidized bed of 190 Kg load capacity and 850 C operating temperature was projected to treat 1,450 T of steel components annually, with energy consumption at 4,000 Kj/Kg of treated steel in comparison with 10,750 Kj/Kg for conventionally treated steel. For the test plant annual energy consumption was projected at 9.8 x 16 Mj, equivalent to 233 TEP.
The programme also called for the purchase and setting-up of a monitoring, controlling and data recording system to appraise conventional furnace energy consumption.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
This project has not yet been classified with EuroSciVoc.
Be the first one to suggest relevant scientific fields and help us improve our classification service
You need to log in or register to use this function
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Data not available
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
SL2 4QD Slough
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.