Deliverables
Comparative analyses from the case studies will lead to a peer reviewed scholarly article focusing on lessons learned in the area of Security Sector reform.
The scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the cross-cutting theme on ICTs for conflict prevention.
A planning and guidance document outlining the relationship between the project activities, targets, deliverables, milestones and intended strategic impact, in the framework of the project time period, as well as description of how and when progress will be measured.
An in-depth research report drawing conclusions on strengths, challenges and opportunities of EU interventions in conflict prevention and peacebuilding
The Working Paper series will disseminate the findings of the scoping studies and Best Practices reports in a public format, presented in the project corporate style.
Respecting the unique nature of each case, the reporting will try to enhance comparability of the cases by adopting a joint format that leaves enough space to include any particular data from each individual case. Each case study report will for example relate to the conflict history, context and legacy, the EU intervention (against the background of other relevant interventions), the specific EU capabilities according to the focal clusters and themes, specific impact of EU activities, possible areas for improvement and recommendations. The case study reports will benefit from advice and feed-back from the work package lead, local partners and the community of practice and will be subject to the quality assurance system.
A qualitative review will be carried out amongst relevant EU policymakers and staff in Brussels to assess the institutional framework in relation to the EU’s Comprehensive Approach to conflict prevention and peacebuilding.
The paper will outline the research approach, assumptions, research methodology, and Lexicon for the project methodology.
A policy note will outline the key recommendations to the EU based on the assessment and review carried out by the project. It will be accompanied by an internal strategy document outlining how best to engage EU stakeholders on the recommendations.
Roundtable meetings in case study countries, involving a cross-section of stakeholders, including EU regional representation, local and (where relevant) international security sector representatives, relevant regional organisation, local UN agency, local civil society (including women’s organisations), relevant local government agencies, will discuss the case study findings and provide input to the policy recommendations.
The scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the Multi-track Diplomacy assessment cluster.
The scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the Local Ownership cross-cutting theme.
The Working Paper series will disseminate the findings of the scoping studies and Best Practices reports in a public format, presented in the project corporate style.
Respecting the unique nature of each case, the reporting will try to enhance comparability of the cases by adopting a joint format that leaves enough space to include any particular data from each individual case. Each case study report will for example relate to the conflict history, context and legacy, the EU intervention (against the background of other relevant interventions), the specific EU capabilities according to the focal clusters and themes, specific impact of EU activities, possible areas for improvement and recommendations. The case study reports will benefit from advice and feed-back from the work package lead, local partners and the community of practice and will be subject to the quality assurance system.
Roundtable meetings in case study countries, involving a cross-section of stakeholders, including EU regional representation, local and (where relevant) international security sector representatives, relevant regional organisation, local UN agency, local civil society (including women’s organisations), relevant local government agencies, will discuss the case study findings and provide input to the policy recommendations.
Comparative analyses from the case studies will lead to a peer reviewed scholarly article focusing on lessons learned in the area of multi-track diplomacy.
The strategy will outline the target groups, channels and means, and timing of the relevant deliverables, as well as the means for monitoring and assessing progress of communication and dissemination actions.
The best practices reports will be based on the research, mapping and stakeholder engagement. An online workspace will be used to organise the findings and complement face to face engagement with experts and stakeholders. The reports will contribute to identifying ideas, problems and challenges for EU peacebuilding which will require further conceptualisation, analysis and problem-solving beyond the life of this project. This will contribute to outlining a set of research priorities at multiple levels of analysis and decision-making.
The scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the Governance assessment cluster.
Comparative analyses from the case studies will lead to a peer reviewed scholarly article focusing on lessons learned in the area of Security Sector reform.
The proposed research will be submitted to an ethics committee at the national level, if such committees do exist and approval by them is legally required. We know that this is not the case in several countries. In the Netherlands, for example, such committees do not exist for the social sciences and humanities. However, if such committees do exist and approval is required in any of the countries where we operate, copies of ethical approvals by the competent Ethics Committees will be submitted to the EU before the end of month 5.
The scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the Gender cross-cutting theme.
Roundtable meetings in case study countries, involving a cross-section of stakeholders, including EU regional representation, local and (where relevant) international security sector representatives, relevant regional organisation, local UN agency, local civil society (including women’s organisations), relevant local government agencies, will discuss the case study findings and provide input to the policy recommendations.
The Quality Assurance Plan and Reviewing Schedule will be part of the reporting guidelines for the project partners, to ensure that all planned deliverables and milestones are achieved according to the quality standards of the project.
The synoptic report will make preliminary observations of comparison drawn from the case study reports.
The best practices reports will be based on the research, mapping and stakeholder engagement. An online workspace will be used to organise the findings and complement face to face engagement with experts and stakeholders. The reports will contribute to identifying ideas, problems and challenges for EU peacebuilding which will require further conceptualisation, analysis and problem-solving beyond the life of this project. This will contribute to outlining a set of research priorities at multiple levels of analysis and decision-making.
Respecting the unique nature of each case, the reporting will try to enhance comparability of the cases by adopting a joint format that leaves enough space to include any particular data from each individual case. Each case study report will for example relate to the conflict history, context and legacy, the EU intervention (against the background of other relevant interventions), the specific EU capabilities according to the focal clusters and themes, specific impact of EU activities, possible areas for improvement and recommendations. The case study reports will benefit from advice and feed-back from the work package lead, local partners and the community of practice and will be subject to the quality assurance system.
The best practices reports will be based on the research, mapping and stakeholder engagement. An online workspace will be used to organise the findings and complement face to face engagement with experts and stakeholders. The reports will contribute to identifying ideas, problems and challenges for EU peacebuilding which will require further conceptualisation, analysis and problem-solving beyond the life of this project. This will contribute to outlining a set of research priorities at multiple levels of analysis and decision-making.
The policy briefing will provide a background summary on EU priorities and involvement in each of the case study countries.
The scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the SSR assessment cluster and the civ-mil synergies cross-cutting theme.
Respecting the unique nature of each case, the reporting will try to enhance comparability of the cases by adopting a joint format that leaves enough space to include any particular data from each individual case. Each case study report will for example relate to the conflict history, context and legacy, the EU intervention (against the background of other relevant interventions), the specific EU capabilities according to the focal clusters and themes, specific impact of EU activities, possible areas for improvement and recommendations. The case study reports will benefit from advice and feed-back from the work package lead, local partners and the community of practice and will be subject to the quality assurance system.
The scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the Multi-stakeholder Coherence cross-cutting theme.
The data management plan will specify what data will be stored, its classification, and planning of dissemination, in compliance with ethical guidelines.
The Working Paper series will disseminate the findings of the scoping studies and Best Practices reports in a public format, presented in the project corporate style.
The best practices reports will be based on the research, mapping and stakeholder engagement. An online workspace will be used to organise the findings and complement face to face engagement with experts and stakeholders. The reports will contribute to identifying ideas, problems and challenges for EU peacebuilding which will require further conceptualisation, analysis and problem-solving beyond the life of this project. This will contribute to outlining a set of research priorities at multiple levels of analysis and decision-making.
The assessment part of the project will include a limited and focused desk review to collect documented lessons learned from beyond these specific countries, including the case of the Western Balkans and earlier experiences in Central America.
The best practices reports will be based on the research, mapping and stakeholder engagement. An online workspace will be used to organise the findings and complement face to face engagement with experts and stakeholders. The reports will contribute to identifying ideas, problems and challenges for EU peacebuilding which will require further conceptualisation, analysis and problem-solving beyond the life of this project. This will contribute to outlining a set of research priorities at multiple levels of analysis and decision-making.
Roundtable meetings in case study countries, involving a cross-section of stakeholders, including EU regional representation, local and (where relevant) international security sector representatives, relevant regional organisation, local UN agency, local civil society (including women’s organisations), relevant local government agencies, will discuss the case study findings and provide input to the policy recommendations.
Special attention will be paid to ensure media presence and press releases for the final conference. There will be a media section in the website, and press releases for each event.
The logo, project website and online community will be developed by the GPPAC Communications team to underpin the corporate identity of the project and the consortium. The online community is further a means for engagement for the community of practice. Online deliverables are part of GPPAC’s Peace Portal platform.
A video will be developed for usage in public events, website and social media explaining in an easy and accessible way conflict prevention experiences and the potential of the EU in the field. This will include footage from (some) case study countries and EU missions to make a compelling visualisation of the project’s objectives and processes.
The GPPAC Communications team will develop a leaflet, a brochure and banners to be used in our public events and when attending external conferences and seminars, using the distinct visual identity of the project.
Local policy dialogue events hosted by the EU-based consortium partners in their respective capitals will engage national (member state) stakeholders on the research findings and policy recommendations.
Local policy dialogue events hosted by the EU-based consortium partners in their respective capitals will engage national (member state) stakeholders on the research findings and policy recommendations.
An international conference in Brussels, including at least 50 participants and reaching a wider audience via live stream, will present and discuss the policy recommendations to the EU and key stakeholders.
There will be workshops for local research teams in each of the case study countries, based on the agreed Theoretical framework and ethical guidelines.
Local policy dialogue events hosted by the EU-based consortium partners in their respective capitals will engage national (member state) stakeholders on the research findings and policy recommendations.
The Community of Practice events will present and discuss the scoping studies and additional research on best practices in the given topics, with a range of selected stakeholders and subject matter experts. Where possible, they will take place within the framework of existing forums and events.
The Community of Practice events will present and discuss the scoping studies and additional research on best practices in the given topics, with a range of selected stakeholders and subject matter experts. Where possible, they will take place within the framework of existing forums and events.
The findings of the WP4 activities (community of practice) will be presented and discussed in an interactive workshop along with the case study reports (WP3) for the purpose of comparative analysis.
The Community of Practice events will present and discuss the scoping studies and additional research on best practices in the given topics, with a range of selected stakeholders and subject matter experts. Where possible, they will take place within the framework of existing forums and events.
Local policy dialogue events hosted by the EU-based consortium partners in their respective capitals will engage national (member state) stakeholders on the research findings and policy recommendations.
The Community of Practice events will present and discuss the scoping studies and additional research on best practices in the given topics, with a range of selected stakeholders and subject matter experts. Where possible, they will take place within the framework of existing forums and events.
The Community of Practice events will present and discuss the scoping studies and additional research on best practices in the given topics, with a range of selected stakeholders and subject matter experts. Where possible, they will take place within the framework of existing forums and events.
Local policy dialogue events hosted by the EU-based consortium partners in their respective capitals will engage national (member state) stakeholders on the research findings and policy recommendations.
Searching for OpenAIRE data...
Publications
Author(s): van der Borgh, G.J.C.; Zweerink, F.M.; Le Roy, Puck
Published in: 2, 2017
Publisher: Utrecht University
Author(s): van der Borgh, G.J.C.; Frerks, G.E.; Martin, Mary; Bojicic-Dzelilovic, Vesna
Published in: 3, 2016
Publisher: Utrecht University
Author(s): van der Borgh, G.J.C.
Published in: 1, 2016
Publisher: Utrecht University
Author(s): Vesna Bojicic-Dzelilovic and Mary Martin
Published in: 2016
Publisher: London School of Economics and Political Science
Author(s): Chris van der Borgh, Mary Martin and Vesna BojicicDzelilovic (autors)
Published in: 2017
Publisher: Utrecht University and London School of Economics and Political Science
Author(s): Leonid Litra, Ivan Medynskyi and Kateryna Zarembo
Published in: 2017
Publisher: Institute of World Policy
Author(s): Dr. Shyamika Jayasundara-Smits
Published in: 2017
Publisher: Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict
Author(s): Pamela Urrutia, María Villellas and Ana Villellas
Published in: 2016
Publisher: Escola de Cultura de Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Author(s): Pr. Linda Benraïs and Julie Simon
Published in: 2016
Publisher: ESSEC IRENÉ - Institute for Research and Education on Negotiation
Author(s): Toon Dirkx
Published in: 2017
Publisher: Utrecht University
Author(s): Jennifer Rhian Gaskell, Helena Puig Larrauri, Johannes Rieken, Ali Ali and Anouk Ritgerink
Published in: 2016
Publisher: LSE and Build Up
Author(s): Ana Villellas, Pamela Urrutia and María Villellas
Published in: International Peace Institute Global Observatory, /, 2016, Page(s) /
Publisher: International Peace Institute Global Observatory
Author(s): Toon Dirkx
Published in: 22 September 2016, 2016
Publisher: Centre for Conflict Studies, Utrecht University
Author(s): María Villellas, Pamela Urrutia, Ana Villellas, Vicenç Fisas
Published in: 31 March 2016, 2016
Publisher: Escola de Cultura de Pau, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Author(s): Dr. Shyamika Jayasundara-Smits
Published in: 30 November 2016, 2016
Publisher: Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict
Author(s): Dr. Vesna Bojicic-Dzelilovic
Published in: J Political Science > JZ International relations, 31 March 2016, 2016
Publisher: London School of Economics and Political Science
Author(s): Dr. Véronique Dudouet, Matteo Dressler
Published in: 31 March 2016, 2016
Publisher: Berghof Foundation
Author(s): Dr. Shyamika Jayasundara-Smits, Dr. Lisa Schirch
Published in: 31 March 2016, 2016, Page(s) http://issat.dcaf.ch/mkd/Learn/Resource-Library/Other-Documents/EU-and-Security-Sector-Reform-Tilting-at-Windmills
Publisher: Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict
Author(s): Stina Lundström, Matteo Dressler
Published in: 31 March 2016, 2016
Publisher: Berghof Foundation
Author(s): Gabriëlla Vogelaar, Dr. Shyamika Jayasundara-Smits
Published in: 30 September 2016, 2016
Publisher: Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict
Author(s): Ana Villellas, María Villellas, Pamela Urrutia
Published in: 30 September 2016, 2016
Publisher: Escola de Cultura de Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona