Risultati finali
Comparative analyses from the case studies will lead to a peer reviewed scholarly article focusing on lessons learned in the area of Security Sector reform.
Scoping study ICTsThe scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the cross-cutting theme on ICTs for conflict prevention.
PME frameworkA planning and guidance document outlining the relationship between the project activities, targets, deliverables, milestones and intended strategic impact, in the framework of the project time period, as well as description of how and when progress will be measured.
Research reportAn in-depth research report drawing conclusions on strengths, challenges and opportunities of EU interventions in conflict prevention and peacebuilding
WOSCAP Working paper 1The Working Paper series will disseminate the findings of the scoping studies and Best Practices reports in a public format, presented in the project corporate style.
Case study report GeorgiaRespecting the unique nature of each case, the reporting will try to enhance comparability of the cases by adopting a joint format that leaves enough space to include any particular data from each individual case. Each case study report will for example relate to the conflict history, context and legacy, the EU intervention (against the background of other relevant interventions), the specific EU capabilities according to the focal clusters and themes, specific impact of EU activities, possible areas for improvement and recommendations. The case study reports will benefit from advice and feed-back from the work package lead, local partners and the community of practice and will be subject to the quality assurance system.
Review of EU policy institutional levelA qualitative review will be carried out amongst relevant EU policymakers and staff in Brussels to assess the institutional framework in relation to the EU’s Comprehensive Approach to conflict prevention and peacebuilding.
Theoretical framework paperThe paper will outline the research approach, assumptions, research methodology, and Lexicon for the project methodology.
Policy Recommendations Paper & engagement strategyA policy note will outline the key recommendations to the EU based on the assessment and review carried out by the project. It will be accompanied by an internal strategy document outlining how best to engage EU stakeholders on the recommendations.
Roundtable report YemenRoundtable meetings in case study countries, involving a cross-section of stakeholders, including EU regional representation, local and (where relevant) international security sector representatives, relevant regional organisation, local UN agency, local civil society (including women’s organisations), relevant local government agencies, will discuss the case study findings and provide input to the policy recommendations.
Scoping study Multi-track Diplo.The scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the Multi-track Diplomacy assessment cluster.
Scoping study Local OwnershipThe scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the Local Ownership cross-cutting theme.
WOSCAP Working paper 4-5The Working Paper series will disseminate the findings of the scoping studies and Best Practices reports in a public format, presented in the project corporate style.
Case study report MaliRespecting the unique nature of each case, the reporting will try to enhance comparability of the cases by adopting a joint format that leaves enough space to include any particular data from each individual case. Each case study report will for example relate to the conflict history, context and legacy, the EU intervention (against the background of other relevant interventions), the specific EU capabilities according to the focal clusters and themes, specific impact of EU activities, possible areas for improvement and recommendations. The case study reports will benefit from advice and feed-back from the work package lead, local partners and the community of practice and will be subject to the quality assurance system.
Roundtable report MaliRoundtable meetings in case study countries, involving a cross-section of stakeholders, including EU regional representation, local and (where relevant) international security sector representatives, relevant regional organisation, local UN agency, local civil society (including women’s organisations), relevant local government agencies, will discuss the case study findings and provide input to the policy recommendations.
Scholarly article: Multi-track DiplomacyComparative analyses from the case studies will lead to a peer reviewed scholarly article focusing on lessons learned in the area of multi-track diplomacy.
Communication & Dissemination strategyThe strategy will outline the target groups, channels and means, and timing of the relevant deliverables, as well as the means for monitoring and assessing progress of communication and dissemination actions.
Best practices report: Civ-mil synergiesThe best practices reports will be based on the research, mapping and stakeholder engagement. An online workspace will be used to organise the findings and complement face to face engagement with experts and stakeholders. The reports will contribute to identifying ideas, problems and challenges for EU peacebuilding which will require further conceptualisation, analysis and problem-solving beyond the life of this project. This will contribute to outlining a set of research priorities at multiple levels of analysis and decision-making.
Scoping study GovernanceThe scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the Governance assessment cluster.
Scholarly article: Governance ReformComparative analyses from the case studies will lead to a peer reviewed scholarly article focusing on lessons learned in the area of Security Sector reform.
Copies of ethical approvalsThe proposed research will be submitted to an ethics committee at the national level, if such committees do exist and approval by them is legally required. We know that this is not the case in several countries. In the Netherlands, for example, such committees do not exist for the social sciences and humanities. However, if such committees do exist and approval is required in any of the countries where we operate, copies of ethical approvals by the competent Ethics Committees will be submitted to the EU before the end of month 5.
Scoping study GenderThe scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the Gender cross-cutting theme.
Roundtable report UkraineRoundtable meetings in case study countries, involving a cross-section of stakeholders, including EU regional representation, local and (where relevant) international security sector representatives, relevant regional organisation, local UN agency, local civil society (including women’s organisations), relevant local government agencies, will discuss the case study findings and provide input to the policy recommendations.
Quality Assurance planThe Quality Assurance Plan and Reviewing Schedule will be part of the reporting guidelines for the project partners, to ensure that all planned deliverables and milestones are achieved according to the quality standards of the project.
Synoptic report case studiesThe synoptic report will make preliminary observations of comparison drawn from the case study reports.
Best practices report: ICTsThe best practices reports will be based on the research, mapping and stakeholder engagement. An online workspace will be used to organise the findings and complement face to face engagement with experts and stakeholders. The reports will contribute to identifying ideas, problems and challenges for EU peacebuilding which will require further conceptualisation, analysis and problem-solving beyond the life of this project. This will contribute to outlining a set of research priorities at multiple levels of analysis and decision-making.
Case study report YemenRespecting the unique nature of each case, the reporting will try to enhance comparability of the cases by adopting a joint format that leaves enough space to include any particular data from each individual case. Each case study report will for example relate to the conflict history, context and legacy, the EU intervention (against the background of other relevant interventions), the specific EU capabilities according to the focal clusters and themes, specific impact of EU activities, possible areas for improvement and recommendations. The case study reports will benefit from advice and feed-back from the work package lead, local partners and the community of practice and will be subject to the quality assurance system.
Best practices Report: Multi-stakeholder coherenceThe best practices reports will be based on the research, mapping and stakeholder engagement. An online workspace will be used to organise the findings and complement face to face engagement with experts and stakeholders. The reports will contribute to identifying ideas, problems and challenges for EU peacebuilding which will require further conceptualisation, analysis and problem-solving beyond the life of this project. This will contribute to outlining a set of research priorities at multiple levels of analysis and decision-making.
EU Policy briefingThe policy briefing will provide a background summary on EU priorities and involvement in each of the case study countries.
Scoping study SSR & Civ-milThe scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the SSR assessment cluster and the civ-mil synergies cross-cutting theme.
Case study report UkraineRespecting the unique nature of each case, the reporting will try to enhance comparability of the cases by adopting a joint format that leaves enough space to include any particular data from each individual case. Each case study report will for example relate to the conflict history, context and legacy, the EU intervention (against the background of other relevant interventions), the specific EU capabilities according to the focal clusters and themes, specific impact of EU activities, possible areas for improvement and recommendations. The case study reports will benefit from advice and feed-back from the work package lead, local partners and the community of practice and will be subject to the quality assurance system.
Scoping study Multistakeholder CoherenceThe scoping study report will give a summary of the state of the art and research gaps in relation to the Multi-stakeholder Coherence cross-cutting theme.
Data Management PlanThe data management plan will specify what data will be stored, its classification, and planning of dissemination, in compliance with ethical guidelines.
WOSCAP Working paper 2-3The Working Paper series will disseminate the findings of the scoping studies and Best Practices reports in a public format, presented in the project corporate style.
Best practices report: Local ownershipThe best practices reports will be based on the research, mapping and stakeholder engagement. An online workspace will be used to organise the findings and complement face to face engagement with experts and stakeholders. The reports will contribute to identifying ideas, problems and challenges for EU peacebuilding which will require further conceptualisation, analysis and problem-solving beyond the life of this project. This will contribute to outlining a set of research priorities at multiple levels of analysis and decision-making.
Desk review case studiesThe assessment part of the project will include a limited and focused desk review to collect documented lessons learned from beyond these specific countries, including the case of the Western Balkans and earlier experiences in Central America.
Best practices report: GenderThe best practices reports will be based on the research, mapping and stakeholder engagement. An online workspace will be used to organise the findings and complement face to face engagement with experts and stakeholders. The reports will contribute to identifying ideas, problems and challenges for EU peacebuilding which will require further conceptualisation, analysis and problem-solving beyond the life of this project. This will contribute to outlining a set of research priorities at multiple levels of analysis and decision-making.
Roundtable report GeorgiaRoundtable meetings in case study countries, involving a cross-section of stakeholders, including EU regional representation, local and (where relevant) international security sector representatives, relevant regional organisation, local UN agency, local civil society (including women’s organisations), relevant local government agencies, will discuss the case study findings and provide input to the policy recommendations.
Special attention will be paid to ensure media presence and press releases for the final conference. There will be a media section in the website, and press releases for each event.
Logo, project website & online communityThe logo, project website and online community will be developed by the GPPAC Communications team to underpin the corporate identity of the project and the consortium. The online community is further a means for engagement for the community of practice. Online deliverables are part of GPPAC’s Peace Portal platform.
Promotional videoA video will be developed for usage in public events, website and social media explaining in an easy and accessible way conflict prevention experiences and the potential of the EU in the field. This will include footage from (some) case study countries and EU missions to make a compelling visualisation of the project’s objectives and processes.
Promotional materialsThe GPPAC Communications team will develop a leaflet, a brochure and banners to be used in our public events and when attending external conferences and seminars, using the distinct visual identity of the project.
Local policy dialogue events hosted by the EU-based consortium partners in their respective capitals will engage national (member state) stakeholders on the research findings and policy recommendations.
Policy dialogue LondonLocal policy dialogue events hosted by the EU-based consortium partners in their respective capitals will engage national (member state) stakeholders on the research findings and policy recommendations.
International conferenceAn international conference in Brussels, including at least 50 participants and reaching a wider audience via live stream, will present and discuss the policy recommendations to the EU and key stakeholders.
Methodology workshopsThere will be workshops for local research teams in each of the case study countries, based on the agreed Theoretical framework and ethical guidelines.
Policy dialogue The HagueLocal policy dialogue events hosted by the EU-based consortium partners in their respective capitals will engage national (member state) stakeholders on the research findings and policy recommendations.
CoP event CoherenceThe Community of Practice events will present and discuss the scoping studies and additional research on best practices in the given topics, with a range of selected stakeholders and subject matter experts. Where possible, they will take place within the framework of existing forums and events.
Community of Practice (CoP) event Local OwnershipThe Community of Practice events will present and discuss the scoping studies and additional research on best practices in the given topics, with a range of selected stakeholders and subject matter experts. Where possible, they will take place within the framework of existing forums and events.
Comparative Analysis workshopThe findings of the WP4 activities (community of practice) will be presented and discussed in an interactive workshop along with the case study reports (WP3) for the purpose of comparative analysis.
CoP event ICTsThe Community of Practice events will present and discuss the scoping studies and additional research on best practices in the given topics, with a range of selected stakeholders and subject matter experts. Where possible, they will take place within the framework of existing forums and events.
Policy dialogue MadridLocal policy dialogue events hosted by the EU-based consortium partners in their respective capitals will engage national (member state) stakeholders on the research findings and policy recommendations.
CoP event GenderThe Community of Practice events will present and discuss the scoping studies and additional research on best practices in the given topics, with a range of selected stakeholders and subject matter experts. Where possible, they will take place within the framework of existing forums and events.
CoP event Civ-MilThe Community of Practice events will present and discuss the scoping studies and additional research on best practices in the given topics, with a range of selected stakeholders and subject matter experts. Where possible, they will take place within the framework of existing forums and events.
Policy dialogue BerlinLocal policy dialogue events hosted by the EU-based consortium partners in their respective capitals will engage national (member state) stakeholders on the research findings and policy recommendations.
Pubblicazioni
Autori:
van der Borgh, G.J.C.; Zweerink, F.M.; Le Roy, Puck
Pubblicato in:
Numero 2, 2017
Editore:
Utrecht University
Autori:
van der Borgh, G.J.C.; Frerks, G.E.; Martin, Mary; Bojicic-Dzelilovic, Vesna
Pubblicato in:
Numero 3, 2016
Editore:
Utrecht University
Autori:
van der Borgh, G.J.C.
Pubblicato in:
Numero 1, 2016
Editore:
Utrecht University
Autori:
Vesna Bojicic-Dzelilovic and Mary Martin
Pubblicato in:
2016
Editore:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Autori:
Chris van der Borgh, Mary Martin and Vesna BojicicDzelilovic (autors)
Pubblicato in:
2017
Editore:
Utrecht University and London School of Economics and Political Science
Autori:
Leonid Litra, Ivan Medynskyi and Kateryna Zarembo
Pubblicato in:
2017
Editore:
Institute of World Policy
Autori:
Dr. Shyamika Jayasundara-Smits
Pubblicato in:
2017
Editore:
Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict
Autori:
Pamela Urrutia, María Villellas and Ana Villellas
Pubblicato in:
2016
Editore:
Escola de Cultura de Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Autori:
Pr. Linda Benraïs and Julie Simon
Pubblicato in:
2016
Editore:
ESSEC IRENÉ - Institute for Research and Education on Negotiation
Autori:
Toon Dirkx
Pubblicato in:
2017
Editore:
Utrecht University
Autori:
Jennifer Rhian Gaskell, Helena Puig Larrauri, Johannes Rieken, Ali Ali and Anouk Ritgerink
Pubblicato in:
2016
Editore:
LSE and Build Up
Autori:
Ana Villellas, Pamela Urrutia and María Villellas
Pubblicato in:
International Peace Institute Global Observatory, Numero /, 2016, Pagina/e /
Editore:
International Peace Institute Global Observatory
Autori:
Toon Dirkx
Pubblicato in:
Numero 22 September 2016, 2016
Editore:
Centre for Conflict Studies, Utrecht University
Autori:
María Villellas, Pamela Urrutia, Ana Villellas, Vicenç Fisas
Pubblicato in:
Numero 31 March 2016, 2016
Editore:
Escola de Cultura de Pau, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Autori:
Dr. Shyamika Jayasundara-Smits
Pubblicato in:
Numero 30 November 2016, 2016
Editore:
Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict
Autori:
Dr. Vesna Bojicic-Dzelilovic
Pubblicato in:
J Political Science > JZ International relations, Numero 31 March 2016, 2016
Editore:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Autori:
Dr. Véronique Dudouet, Matteo Dressler
Pubblicato in:
Numero 31 March 2016, 2016
Editore:
Berghof Foundation
Autori:
Dr. Shyamika Jayasundara-Smits, Dr. Lisa Schirch
Pubblicato in:
Numero 31 March 2016, 2016, Pagina/e http://issat.dcaf.ch/mkd/Learn/Resource-Library/Other-Documents/EU-and-Security-Sector-Reform-Tilting-at-Windmills
Editore:
Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict
Autori:
Stina Lundström, Matteo Dressler
Pubblicato in:
Numero 31 March 2016, 2016
Editore:
Berghof Foundation
Autori:
Gabriëlla Vogelaar, Dr. Shyamika Jayasundara-Smits
Pubblicato in:
Numero 30 September 2016, 2016
Editore:
Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict
Autori:
Ana Villellas, María Villellas, Pamela Urrutia
Pubblicato in:
Numero 30 September 2016, 2016
Editore:
Escola de Cultura de Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
È in corso la ricerca di dati su OpenAIRE...
Si è verificato un errore durante la ricerca dei dati su OpenAIRE
Nessun risultato disponibile