Project description
Fighting prejudice in the art world
Although the EU is legally bound by the imperative of non-discrimination, contemporary discourses of art generally exclude artists belonging to minority groups. Discourses such as Outsider Art facilitate exclusionary narratives that label some art as deviant or chaotic. Such prejudices, based on what the ArTguments project refers to as ‘exclusionary arguments’, undermine legitimacy in art not endorsed by dominant institutions. EU-funded ArTguments is applying computational methods to discover and analyse these exclusion patterns through argument mining. By revealing how that language influences perceptions, the project hopes to make the world of art more inclusive. It will provide actionable tools for museums and suggest an Observatory of Inclusive Art Discourse to help bring about systemic change throughout Europe’s cultural sector.
Objective
In contemporary Europe, art is used as a means of social exclusion, in contravention of Article 21 (Non-discrimination) of the EU Fundamental Rights Charter. Art is at the centre of exclusionary narratives that directly associate certain forms of artistic expression with dementia and crime, among other controversial issues. Specifically, Western culture has coined the term Outsider Art, along with other derogatory and patronizing labels, to marginalize creators from minority groups, arguing that artworks by those artists are not “meant” to be exhibited in traditional museums and galleries. Using biased arguments, which can be referred to as Exclusionary Arguments, the conventional art establishment questions the legitimacy or authenticity of this type of art and promulgates the idea that it is less valuable than academically recognised art. The ArTguments project seeks to address this issue by developing an automated method for identifying Exclusionary Arguments in the arts, aiming to reduce the entrenched narratives that hinder equitable representation and recognition of all forms of artistic expression in contemporary Western art. This research operates on the hypothesis that Exclusionary Arguments can be identified computationally since they display stable cognitive structures expressed through identifiable linguistic patterns. Hence, the research methodology employed involves applying Argument Mining techniques in order to identify and analyse the Exclusionary Arguments embedded in artistic discourse. ArTguments innovatively addresses exclusion in the art world by introducing Exclusionary Arguments as a novel cognitive and communicative unit, offering a systematic approach to analysing exclusion dynamics within discourse. The project will produce key resources, including a catalogue of best practices with actionable recommendations for promoting an inclusive discourse in museums, and a formal proposal for establishing an Observatory for Inclusive Art Discourse.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- humanities arts
- social sciences sociology social issues social inequalities
- medical and health sciences basic medicine neurology neurodegenerative diseases dementia
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.2 - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF - HORIZON TMA MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships - European Fellowships
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) HORIZON-MSCA-2024-PF-01
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
WC1E 7HX LONDON
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.