The social responsibility of nanotechnology
The project NANODIODE (Developing innovative outreach and dialogue on responsible nanotechnologies in EU civil society) engaged researchers, industry, workers, policymakers and citizens to better integrate societal values and needs in the innovation drive. To promote collaboration among interest groups, partners explored new approaches and communication strategies that advance outreach, training and education on this emerging field. Team members looked at previous related initiatives and took into account all stages of the research and innovation process. They conducted interviews across EU Member States to evaluate perceptions regarding nanotechnology. Their work led to valuable data, materials and reports that enabled them to identify best practices and provide recommendations for responsible nanotechnology research and innovation governance. NANODIODE organised engagement activities such as public exhibitions, stakeholder dialogues, school competitions and policy workshops targeting citizens, professional end users and civil society organisations. The project also produced a NanoTube collection of video clips featuring specialists who work with nanotechnologies in different ways. Other deliverables include presentations, articles, posters and newsletters, as well as some 20 activity reports, project fact sheets and policy briefs, available through the project website. Overall, the activities enhanced mutual understanding among stakeholders. Engagement and dialogue with nanotechnology 'enactors' highlighted how early consideration of ethical and societal dimensions can support quality research and outcomes. Alongside the opportunities, however, there are still barriers to effectively responding to societal challenges. These include complex interdependencies at policymaking, research and production levels, which impact decisions. Buy-in from all stakeholders is thus vital in transitioning to a research and innovation system that is more responsive to societal considerations. The project recommended three main routes to strengthen nanotechnology governance. One is to encourage the effective integration of societal considerations in research and innovation as well as in education. Another is to further develop tools to strengthen the responsiveness of research and innovation to societal considerations. Finally, there must be a move to institutionalise mechanisms for nanotechnology governance. NANODIODE efforts and outcomes support and reinforce the integration of societal considerations in research and innovation decisions. This will enhance the capacity of nanotechnologies to benefit society.
Keywords
Societal considerations, nanotechnology, research and innovation, NANODIODE, nanotechnology governance
