Causal questions are a key part of life. They take many shapes, impacting decisions ranging from perhaps more minor matters like "What is the effect of drinking orange juice on my cold?" to questions with major impact like "Will I live longer if I undergo chemotherapy?".
Causal inference methods can provide answers to questions for which experiments are impossible due to ethical, financial or practical constraints. For example, adopting a vegetarian diet is a choice that cannot be ethically assigned randomly, and research into its effects necessarily relies on causal inference. Causality is complex, and potential causal links can often be explained away by other factors. Continuing the example, perhaps vegetarians live longer because they tend to smoke less or exercise more and not because of the diet.
An obvious solution would be to measure every single thing that could possibly explain away a causal effect, but there's a catch. Contrary to many people's intuition, when aiming to establish the cause of something, it is usually best not to include every factor. However, when you have already measured many things, it's not so easy to decide what should be included. That's the focus of this project. We develop new mathematical tools and theory to select the right information out of a huge amount of data, so that reliable causal relationships can be established. This is done for a variety of settings relevant to real-life.
The expected impact is that more causal questions can be answered using already existing data, so that people can make better informed choices for themselves.