Project description
New algorithms to address proportionality in public decisions
When a group of people (eligible voters) find themselves in disagreement but need to reach a collective decision, they often resort to making compromises. This notion of group fairness, referred to as proportionality, plays a vital role. Proportional algorithms are widely used in various real-life scenarios. To further advance the understanding and application of proportionality in public decision-making, the ERC-funded PRO-DEMOCRATIC project will focus on developing generic reasoning methods to assess the equitable treatment of voters. These methods will be applicable to specific models related to public decisions. Key objectives include testing theorems that specify the conditions under which our understanding of proportionality can be satisfied, analysing rules, and developing a range of algorithms.
Objective
The project is set in the field of computational social choice.
We will focus on formal models describing scenarios, where a group of individuals, called voters, disagrees on certain matters, yet needs to make a collective decision. The decision must truly represents a compromise. We focus on group fairness understood as proportionality. There are numerous real-life scenarios that involve collective (public) decisions, and where our solutions could be applied. Examples include: elections of representative bodies (such as parliaments, faculty boards, etc.), participatory budgeting elections (where citizens decide how to allocate a part of a municipal budget), or scenarios where certain local communities (say, housing cooperatives) make series of decisions. In addition, proportional algorithms for making collective decisions can be used for selecting nominees for an award, for constructing rankings of movies or books, for selecting validators in consensus protocols, such as the blockchain, for constructing rankings of web-pages in response to user queries, for locating public facilities, or for improving genetic algorithms.
The goal of this project is to develop generic methods of reasoning about equity of treatment of voters, and to design new algorithms that satisfy the most demanding criteria of proportionality. The new methods should be applicable to a number of specific models that concern public decisions. We will (1) prove theorems specifying whether and under which conditions our notions of proportionality are satisfiable, and (2) we will analyse various rules and algorithms with respect to our criteria of proportionality and other important desiderata that are commonly considered in social choice theory. We plan to (3) determine the computational complexity of the problem of finding proportional public decisions, and to (4) develop exact, approximation, fixed-parameter-tractable, and heuristic algorithms for this and related computational problems.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences political sciences political transitions elections
- natural sciences computer and information sciences computer security cryptography
- humanities arts modern and contemporary art cinematography
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2022-STG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
00-927 Warszawa
Poland
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.