The first step in this project was to gain deep insights into resting state EEG data and their differential statistical properties based on the condition and status of the subject (e.g. healthy volunteer vs. schizophrenic patient). Based on the previous endeavors, we dove deep into EEG microstates, which are brief, stable patterns of brain activity that are thought to capture the dynamic organization of neural networks. These microstates, lasting only milliseconds, represent fundamental units of brain function and are critical for understanding resting-state EEG. By analyzing microstates, we can detect specific neural signatures and explore how these differ between healthy individuals and patients with schizophrenia. Research suggests that schizophrenia is associated with specific changes to the microstate properties, reflecting underlying disruptions in brain network connectivity. To capture these subtle, disorder-related changes, we investigated microstate dynamics. This foundational analysis is crucial, enabling us to identify potential resting state EEG markers we employ for a data-driven Bayesian model inversion using the DCM framework. We published this groundwork in the renowned journal NeuroImage.
Model inference relies on the stability and reliability of models interpreting brain activity, which is essential for sensitivity analysis, parameter recovery, and robustness evaluation. Sensitivity analysis assesses how small parameter changes affect output, guiding model refinement. Parameter recovery tests the accuracy of estimated values from observed data, ensuring outputs reflect neurobiological mechanisms. Robustness testing evaluates a model's stability across different datasets and conditions. Together, these analyses ensure meaningful insights into neural processes and increase confidence in using computational models to inform brain function and dynamics theories. We thoroughly researched, implemented, tested, and performed in-depth sensitivity and parameter recovery analyses using different methods. Analyses were done in a loop where we adapted the mathematical model definition, performed the analyses again, and compared the results. The results from our analyses were presented at the world-leading conference Organization for Human Brain Mapping Annual Meeting in 2023 and 2024.