European countries are characterised by great diversity in national legal, political, labour, and welfare institutions. We know from an extensive body of existing research that this institutional diversity has important consequences for the economic and social outcomes of citizens and migrants with a regular status across Europe. Yet, we know little about how these same institutions shape the conditions of, and politics about, one of the most vulnerable groups: migrants with an irregular status.
The EU-funded PRIME project studies how variations in national institutions (legal, political, welfare, and labour), and the interests with which they are associated, shape the rights and conditions of irregular migrants in law, policy and practice across EU Member States. PRIME conducts large-scale surveys, structured policy analysis and qualitative interviews with migrants, employers, policy actors, interest groups and voters in eight European countries.
Studying these effects of institutional variations empirically is not a purely academic exercise. Understanding why and how the conditions of irregular migrants vary across institutional contexts is critical for both public debates and policy-making. Understanding the role of national institutions matters for contextualised and, therefore, more effective national-level policymaking and also for transnational policies: common EU policies that take a one-size-fits-all approach and ignore important cross-country variations in national institutions will fail.