Objective
Posing the brain as a predictive system has become a guiding principle that has proven to be particularly fruitful in the study of perceptual processes. Perception is understood as an inferential process in which the brain combines its noisy sensory input with predictions generated by internal models. In this way, the contents of conscious experience would be determined by the hypothesis about the state of the world, with the highest posterior probability. One popular algorithmic incarnation of the predictive processing ideas is predictive coding, in which the brain implements a hierarchy of generative models, where feedback connections carry predictions and feedforward connections carry prediction errors. The brain would minimize these prediction error by updating its internal models. While compelling, this proposal leaves open several issues.
It is not yet clear how a predictive perceptual system could be both sensitive to expected and to surprising stimuli. Bayesian integration of sensory evidence and prior probability of the hypotheses (predictions) might offer an optimal solution. But some authors have argued that Bayesian integration would result in a bias toward the expected. Therefore, the question of how conscious experience emanates from the interaction between predictions and prediction errors remains open.
Predictive coding assumes separate neuronal populations representing predictions and prediction errors, which would reside in different cortical layers. This proposal remains largely untested in humans, in particular in the auditory domain.
This project focuses on the auditory domain, where the ability to predict the incoming sensory stream is fundamental for making sense of everyday auditory scenes, especially in the presence of noise. I will tackle the aforementioned open questions by implementing challenging auditory signal detection tasks, and by combining fMRI data at ultra-high field (7 Tesla), and cutting-edge computational modelling.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.2 - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF - HORIZON TMA MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships - European Fellowships
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) HORIZON-MSCA-2022-PF-01
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
6525 XZ Nijmegen
Netherlands
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.