Project description
Analysing how structural adjustment became a global phenomenon
The late 20th-century international political economy was shaped by shocks from the 1973 oil crisis to the fall of the Iron Curtain. This disorientation led to ‘structural adjustment’ policies that promoted deregulation and privatisation, often seen as necessary due to economic constraints. The ERC-funded ShockAge project will explore how structural adjustment emerged as a global phenomenon. It will analyse various actors involved, including the ‘Group of 77’ of developing countries, international financial organisations such as the World Bank and the IMF, and activism surrounding ‘anti-globalisation’ protests in divided Germany. The project aims to shed light on the intertwined histories of North-South confrontations, neoliberalism, international organisations, and resistance to late 20th-century globalisation.
Objective
The history of the late 20th century international political economy – from the 1973 oil crisis to the fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989 – is often told as a succession of shocks. It has been argued that the resulting disorientation allowed for the global imposition of “structural adjustment”: policies favoring the removal of state regulations and subsidies, the privatization of public assets and services, and the liberalization of trade and foreign investment – “neoliberal globalization” to some. Others argue that there was simply no alternative to these policies because of economic constraints at the time. Accepting neither the imposition nor the no-alternative thesis, ShockAge posits that there were political choices in the South, East and West within a constrained field of maneuver. The project rejects the narrative of a quasi-natural global takeover of neoliberal ideas and instead emphasizes the highly contested nature of the “neoliberal turn”. By going beyond the national or regional level and transnational global (dis)connections, it inquires how structural adjustment became a global phenomenon in the first place. In four subprojects, ShockAge will investigate the contestation of structural adjustment and inquire about the room for maneuver by different actors and the alternatives pursued: 1) at the international/intergovernmental level (focusing on the “Group of 77” of self-described developing countries), 2) at the level of international financial organizations (World Bank and International Monetary Fund), 3) at the national level (Bolivia, a key site of structural adjustment), and 4) at the transnational activist level (“anti-globalization” protests in divided Germany). ShockAge uses a global history approach to revise our understanding of a hinge moment in recent history and breaks new ground in the entangled histories of the North-South confrontation, neoliberalism, international organizations, and popular challenges to late 20th-century “globalization.”
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- humanities history and archaeology history
- social sciences economics and business economics monetary and finances
- social sciences other social sciences development studies development theories global development studies globalization
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2025-STG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
1010 WIEN
Austria
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.