Objective
Contemporary video games are profoundly engaging and motivating to young people, and a growing body of research on epistemic games, or games based on professional practices shows that epistemic games that simulate professional training can make deep and powerful learning available to students. In epistemic games, players develop expertise by playing as novices training to be professionals such as engineers, urban planners, science journalists, and so on. In these games, however, players are not just “playing around” and doing whatever they want. Direct mentoring by experts is part of any professional training, thus explicit guidance is part of an epistemic game. But the mentoring is the kind of mentoring that professionals get in their training experiences, rather than the traditional direct instruction of school-based learning or the skill-and-drill in basic facts and skills that too many educational games currently provide. This proposal addresses a critical issue in the use of such game technologies for learning, namely: How can we assess innovative and creative thinking developed by computer games? Specifically, we plan to validate two assessment instruments (epistemic frame inventories (EFIs)) for game-based learning by showing that they can distinguish between novice and expert thinking in the problems, concepts, and domains of the innovative professions of urban planning and engineering. As a result, we will be able to distinguish levels of performance on the EFIs, as well as determine the relative contribution of overall maturity and domain-specific expertise on frame development. (That is, we will be able to see whether professionals develop “innovative thinking” in general, or whether their expertise in creativity is specific to their area of practice.) In so doing, we propose to both advance the field of educational games, to transfer knowledge about epistemic games and assessment, and to build a long-term collaboration between US and European game re
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences media and communications journalism
- natural sciences computer and information sciences software software applications video games
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP7-PEOPLE-2007-4-2-IIF
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
3584 CS Utrecht
Netherlands
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.