Skip to main content
Go to the home page of the European Commission (opens in new window)
English en
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS
Content archived on 2024-06-20

Grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation for health care recommendations (GRADE)

Objective

Grading the strength of recommendations and the quality of underlying evidence enhances the usefulness of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Although CPG have become a reality in healthcare, professional societies and other organizations until recently had not reached consensus about which of the numerous grading systems they should apply. The latter undermines the value of the grading exercise and the implementation of CPGs. In response to this dilemma, the international GRADE Working Group (the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) reviewed existing grading systems and has developed an approach that is useful for many guideline contexts.

The GRADE working group includes some of the worldwide leading clinical epidemiologists and other researchers with diverse backgrounds and skills representing the Cochrane Collaboration, the World Health Organization (WHO), the National Institutes of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK, and many other government and academic institutions. The GRADE system has been officially adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO). The GRADE working group now faces demands by various organizations for user-friendly software, tackling diagnostic questions, integration of evidence summaries into existing software and handbooks on how to apply the GRADE approach.

This proposal will respond to these demands addressing the following objectives:
1. Develop a user-friendly software application and detailed manual for the application of GRADE methodology
2. Prepare detailed instructions and manuscripts describing the GRADE approach and methodology for diagnostic guidelines and recommendations
3. Obtain feedback from field application of the products from objectives 1 and 2.

We will use electronic and direct communication tools to obtain feedback on the work we conduct as part of this proposal. We will also hold a GRADE working group meeting to complete these objectives.

Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)

CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.

You need to log in or register to use this function

Keywords

Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)

Topic(s)

Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.

Call for proposal

Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.

FP6-2004-MOBILITY-12
See other projects for this call

Funding Scheme

Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.

EIF - Marie Curie actions-Intra-European Fellowships

Coordinator

I.F.O. - I.R.E. (ITALIAN NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE REGINA ELENA)
EU contribution
No data
Total cost

The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.

No data
My booklet 0 0